Posts from Forum

the lower the trade amount, the better. Also, depending on the random number generator (RNG) roll, it can give a very large bonus, or it might not give any bonus at all, meaning the trade will be a gamble.

Yes, that's why we're not talking about canceling this rule everywhere, but only on templates where the variance in red-rush isn't so great.

I want to raise the issue of the relevance of the red rush rule. In my opinion, this rule made sense when the choice of castles was determined by drawing lots. Now, in almost all tournaments and fun games, players use auctions, as this is both more balanced and more interesting. So, if we are bidding for the red color, what is the point of this rule now? After all, we strive to have as few rules as possible. I believe it would be advisable to abolish this rule altogether on all templates if the choice of castles is determined by auctions. If you don't want to be subject to a red rush, bid more for the red color; it's all clear.

Dim, believe me, I have considered and played through all possible and impossible situations on Jebus in all versions. I believe that if there is no red rush on HL+U, then there should not be one on Jebus and Diamond either.

Mizral, FireToSky, Toganash, Redwhait HP, GUNAR, Makiavellileave the tournament:smile51:.
No information or requests for the tournament organizers to set a date and time for the match were received from any of the players.

She had warned everyone before:

what about the list of those lagging behind, are you not aware that you are falling behind?))) or are the deadlines not clear enough?)))

We started playing on Reddit a long time ago, then put it aside because he had things to do with meeting Evil. And, for some reason, I was sure that the deadline was until Sunday, the 19th, which would have been logical. I was online all the time, as was Reddit. I agree that it wasn't her job to ask. Yesterday, we were both playing like idiots in the morning. Since that's the decision of the organizers, I won't argue.
Keep it up, Scorpion. At the beginning, everyone was relaxed in the group stage, which lasted for who knows how long, and then she decided to act on principle. I've always liked consistent people.

And, of course, it would be wrong to publish a list of those lagging behind a couple of days before the end; that's not worthy of the organizers.

I guess I'll chime in too. On one hand, I agree that something needs to be done about the "cotton candy" players. But on the other hand, I disagree with the fact that in the 1/8 playoffs, it now essentially becomes 2 free wins – that's definitely not good. Somehow, in this situation, they should have done something else, in my opinion. Maybe they could have flipped a coin right after the deadline.

Why let those players continue? I think only the semi-finalists should have their time extended, and even then, only if they ask for it, instead of chasing after them.