Posts from Discussion of third-tier monsters.
Who is better?
For me, he's not that great. Not bad, but I often choose poisonous creatures!
But at least it's really helpful (especially for stopping archers before anyone can reach them/fly to them/crawl to them).
They completely ruined the fun...
But at least it's really helpful (especially for stopping archers before anyone can reach them/fly to them/crawl to them).
Poisonous creatures are also quite powerful. They are good against infantry. (Even poisonous creatures will be more useful against crusaders than vampires).
Yes, they are better against all types of infantry! The first level unit will be quickly defeated, the second won't last long either, and the third might even reach the enemy.
They completely ruined the fun...
But it's so helpful (especially for stopping archers before anyone can reach them/fly to them/crawl to them).
But the Death Knight has a higher unit limit (it seems he has more mana). That's really something.
But the Death Knight has a higher limit (it seems he has more mana). That's rough.
But there isn't a Death Knight in this poll:)
(although, death is generally unnatural for me, so forget about this knight)
Added after 30 seconds
I inserted the quote a bit awkwardly.
What's so great about the Vampire? Is it because it can restore health, or because it can dominate using necromancy?
Ah... unfortunately, I don't have that available right now. Play a game with 5 Crusaders against 3 Vampires. Just have them engage in close combat. You'll see how your favorite Vampires fall.
You're both fixated on one of the "favorite units" metrics and trying to prove something to each other!
But taking just one side into account... even all the metrics combined won't give you a real result. That's why balance exists – it's much deeper and more complex than we imagine.
(although, death is generally unnatural for me, so never mind about that knight)
Oh, I didn't think of that :D You're a paladin, so you use light! But you probably play with random units sometimes, then it will be useful :)
In my opinion, "balance" and "luck" in the game mean much more than the difference between a vampire and another level 3 unit!
There's also a big difference between a Djinn and other level 3 units.
There is also a big difference between a Djinn and other level 3 units.
Maybe the Djinn should be moved to level 4?
Optimal, don't forget that vampires are also raised through necromancy. Life creatures' Crusaders are only resurrected after a battle thanks to the Life skill. And Life doesn't have the extra growth, like necromancy or summoning, that Nature has. So, it's not 3 vampires, but more – much more! And the Crusaders are doomed.
Added after 52 seconds
to Alex Ghost and OptiMAL
You're both fixated on one of the "favorite units" indicators and trying to prove something to each other!
But you're not considering one of the sides... even all the indicators together won't give you a real result. The balance exists because it's much deeper and more complex than we think.
But it's enough to buy a lord from the life tavern and level him up to 2nd lvl, so that the cathedral is 2nd level. And then you get +1(6\week in version 3.0 and 7 in 3.51) crusaders per week. But your necromancy should be of a high level to raise vamps. If you only level up that, you will be limited in terms of development
You level up a Necromancer. Soon there are vampires. I level up a general. The vampires will cry when a Crusader with 35\35 stats comes for them:)
How can I not afford a Lord? I don't mind spending 1500 gold for the extra boost. :)
You're leveling up a Necromancer. Soon you'll have Vampires. I'm leveling up a general. The Vampires will be crying when a Crusader with 35/35 stats comes after them. :)