Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
I don't think we should delay any further.
A series of numbers is indeed a series of numbers: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9.
Two (3), three (3), four (6) - and so on - the number of letters in the spelling of the corresponding number. Usually, people count one, two, three, and so on, but less often, for example, when learning to dance - one, two, three.
The words One and One are also in the question.
I don't know if the option 7 - one - counts, as the question is not mine.
In general, 4 3.
But Ment is definitely the closest.
Hmm, yes, it would be better if it were closer. But in this case, it's not obvious that it's a score and not the names of numbers; the question doesn't really imply that. And the number "one" doesn't exist; there's "one" or the less common "unit."
I assume that the original text hinted at it being a score. I didn't remember it. But I can't find the original online, so that's why I wanted to ask. In general, the idea isn't new; the first mention of recording numbers by the number of letters in the number was in Burda's training exercises, back in 1990.
A riddle for kindergarteners that even adults couldn't solve.
Perhaps the reason lies in the confusing wording of the question.
Смысла нет, но вы держитесь там. Удачи, здоровья, хорошего настроения! И пока в кармане пачка милкиуэйев - значит все не так уж плохо на сегодняшний день