Posts from Sacred Haven of Debauchery Auto-translated

Pardon me, but I'm going off on a tangent here: Heroist, what is this talk about good and evil? What kind of balance are you referring to? Good and evil are merely a human assessment of something. Why is this assessment balance needed? Justice is simply an expectation of that assessment. Currently, each person has their own program that calculates the expectation of the surrounding world's assessment. If there is constant contradiction, the program considers itself inadequate and tries to self-destruct (alcohol, depression, suicide). But there is another way out: to change oneself. The first thing the brain wants is to involve others in its problem to seek help (if this program is needed by another program, it will survive). Next, it is necessary to change, otherwise it will return to the initial stage. But there, it happens only if the capabilities are weak. Imagine a brain where each neuron is a brain, and human connections are synapses. A strong connection allows one to push their idea forward, and the strength of the individual will determine whether they will change others. This will happen if the capabilities and the person are strong. In other words, without changing the program, it changes the world, not itself. Has the idea matured? That's not enough. You need to find a person who is willing to sail in the same boat, but who has stronger connections to advance in the world. We help them with ideas, and they help us sail. It is quite possible that they will want to take everything for themselves. For the idea to live, this must be allowed. The person will die; it will no longer matter to them under what name the idea will live. In any case, it is more important to let the idea live than to indulge in self-importance. Self-importance is said to be a nasty thing, but without it, humanity is just a herd of animals. Self-importance is potential; the main problem is its vector, not its existence. Let's go back to the beginning. Now, I can explain it a little differently. Since the program cannot advance itself through synapses, it closes in on itself and tries to self-destruct, but before that, it begins to attract attention to itself (a clever way to make connections work from the other side, since it has failed on its own). If even this does not work, the program is destroyed (this is not necessarily death). There are several options: 1) Retranslator. After the destruction (or pushing into a deep "self") of its program, the neuron begins to play the role of a retranslator of other people's ideas (sometimes even filtering, if the destruction is not complete). The neuron itself ("I") no longer exists, because it is just an amplification of the synapse signal for another neuron. Self-importance must be nourished, always. It is just potential. Now it is nourished by someone else's self-importance. The potential works for another. Example: "Vatnik." 2) Reboot. Building a new program (based on the old one). We begin to accept the existing world, but we do not let it go too deep into ourselves. We make adjustments to our program and start it again. Self-importance suffers because we have lost part of the potential on the wrong program. But we have ourselves and try to promote it to others. Example: Adaptable people (some of them are usually called Jews, even if they are not). 3) Isolated neuron. These are usually those who begin to fight their self-importance or run away from the world. Such neurons break out of the general network of neurons and live in isolation, not understanding that the network is the most important thing for humanity. Example: Castaneda, who was constantly under the influence of substances. It should be noted that a significant number of such isolated neurons can create their own network (suddenly), which will already be option number 2. 4) Dead neuron. Here, everything is simple: isolation or death of a person. Example: death. 5) Creation. A person begins to accept the world, allows himself to make mistakes in order to build a program. Self-importance acquires a different vector (any person, including himself, is now not a means, but a goal of the vector). He accepts that everyone around him is the same people who can make mistakes. That strange love for everything awakens. At the same time, he understands that he needs to love himself too, because only through love for himself will he begin to love those around him. Example: a person who survived clinical death. People on the forum are new synapses for a subject, which may not exist in real life. A stranger is not obliged to understand me as I understand myself. And I may not understand him as he wants. There are simple questions: 1) What do you want? 2) How can you achieve it? 3) What will happen if it comes true? Now, specifically: 1) Everyone around is a person, and you are one of them. Equality and tolerance. There was a case, a long time ago. An acquaintance, an "idol" for all the girls, and the guys also respected him very much. He did not bend, did not whine, realized his dream, loved his family. Next to him, you feel a little pathetic, and sometimes you even envy him. Once, I called him on the phone. In response, some voices. Apparently, the call was answered by accident. And I was curious, so I eavesdropped. It turned out that he was with a psychologist and complained about life, very, very much. I felt uncomfortable. I am not at all worried that I eavesdropped, because it gave a phenomenal result; I stopped nitpicking at acquaintances, allowed them to make mistakes, and did not criticize (except for work-related matters, where it is sometimes necessary). Among the "big guys," there is a lot of responsibility, competition, and they are often someone's target, and it is easier for them to die. Responsibility is to take on the burden of one's existence in this world as it is. 2) Accept yourself and your point of view. Otherwise, "the right to life." This does not mean that you need to defend your point of view everywhere and always. You just need to prove to yourself that you have the right to think this way, and there is nothing wrong with it. Immediately, there will be a desire to fight for yourself in this world, that is, for your ideas. There is also an example. When I was young, I often predicted how one event or another might turn out in simple areas: for example, what would happen if a sailboat was built on wheels, a jump from the fifth floor into a snowdrift, or a dog locked in a basement. I often hesitated to express my opinion, and if I did, I mumbled. This continued for a long time, until I was older, and someone actually got hurt. It was necessary to climb the wall to the third floor of a house. There was a more complicated, but safe way. And there was a simple and dangerous way. I could not insist on my opinion. After that, all the fear disappeared, and I began to insist on my opinion, which leads to actions, and not just armchair battles. In other words, take responsibility. Life in this world with its quirks is a responsibility to the surrounding world. Every person is part of the world and has the right to take on even a small part of it. 3) Try to love those who already love you, or do not give false hope. Responsibility for your choice and people. Love is a different concept. Passion can destroy it. But it happens... Even here, you can accept it or let it go. For example, a person does not love you, cannot stand you, etc. - leave him alone. It will be better for you later. There is an example, but it is too personal. 4) If there is nothing interesting around, create it yourself. People will then be drawn to you. There are also examples, but I'm too lazy to write them

Nonsense, rubbish, and utter drivel.

I don't entirely agree, but there are many sensible points, Dyrman. That's my opinion.

Dyrman, what about Necromancers, who are already dead? Dead neurons?

Dyrman, what about necromancers, who are already dead? Dead neurons?

Point 2, and sometimes even 3, but often after point 4 )))
A necromancer's army - point 1.

So, am I already dead?

Nonsense, rubbish, and utter drivel.

Why be so harsh right away?
It's a good idea; there are more than enough ideas for a new religion. Or they could travel around the country giving webinars...

Too much text, I didn't bother reading it. So, I'll just share a convincing post from Revan.

An inexhaustible supply of suckers in Russia... :smile35: :(

Let’s discuss something positive instead. For example, let’s talk about me.

Nonsense, rubbish, and utter foolishness.

One program encounters another)

Added 1 minute ago

So, does that mean I'm already dead?

They say you don't necessarily have to die. The main thing is to separate the spirit from the body. Although, in essence, it's death (in a human sense). Then yes)
But Necropolis has a gift: even the dead can remain in the "network")


Added 1 minute ago

Why be so harsh right away?
It's a good idea, there are more than enough ideas for a new religion. Or they could travel the country giving webinars...

The Russian Orthodox Church won't allow it. It's just too unconventional)

Added 1 minute ago
It's time to make cyborgs.

Is it just me, or is anyone else having trouble with the Mentat signature?
I keep accidentally clicking on it with my mouse, and it takes me to the expo topic when I don't need to be there.

Same here.

Trolling from the court mage Nemta, that’s just how he is.

I wonder if I'm the only one having trouble with Ment's signature?

I had that issue once too.