[POLL] AK and other weapon customization — Tournament History

No ratings yet — be the first to rate!

Multiple choice Public votes Closed 2015-08-12

This poll is closed.

Allow combining moderation duties with membership in the Arbitration Committee

69.4% 34 votes

Prohibit combining moderation duties with membership in the Arbitration Committee

22.4% 11 votes

1 person is making changes to the ХВ rules

8.2% 4 votes

AK makes changes to the rules for Hv

46.9% 23 votes

Changes to the rules of Heroes & Might & Magic will be made after a general vote

38.8% 19 votes

The rules for official Tournaments are determined by their organizer

36.7% 18 votes

The rules for official Tournaments are part of the ХВ rules

57.1% 28 votes

Leave restart on block

63.3% 31 votes

Remove restart on block

32.7% 16 votes

You can start digging for the Grail from week 6

32.7% 16 votes

You can start digging for the Grail on week 1

63.3% 31 votes

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Next
Last

Wicc

11 years ago

Auto-translated

Discussion of proposals is here – AK Tuning and other things and here – your questions about the game rules (improving interpretation)

If anyone hasn't read it yet, please do so before voting.

There are 5 questions up for a vote, so multiple choice is allowed.

The criteria for participating in the vote are the same as for the AK elections: 1 year of registration and 1 tournament played.

Decisions are made by a simple majority of votes.

The engine doesn't allow revoting, so if you made a mistake or changed your mind, write on the forum; I will take this into account when counting.

If something is unclear in the wording, you can ask here or in the discussion threads.

scorp

11 years ago

Auto-translated

are there no other options for the grail? like, based on the number of visited locations or in percentage terms, for example, visited 7-15 locations?

In reply to scorp

Wicc

11 years ago

Auto-translated

scorp

Are there no other options for the Grail? Like, based on the number of visited locations or a percentage, for example, visiting 7-15 locations?

It's too complicated. Either allow it completely or don't bother. Just my opinion, of course. If there are many people who want intermediate options, then it's okay.

The_

11 years ago

Auto-translated

The poll is not legitimate, the issue of blocking is not fully addressed, and simply saying yes or no is not enough. It seems that if I vote to cancel the technical restrictions on blocking, I automatically agree to three consecutive turns with a blocking unit from a castle and a defeat – I don’t agree with that. On the other hand, some changes to the rules could be made, and perhaps even should be, but they should be discussed first, and the opinions of the majority who want to express themselves should be heard, rather than creating a poll after 12 hours of discussion. Now, people will just click on the options, and someone will kindly add it to the rules later – no thank you.
And the rest of the questionnaire looks more like a farce. For example, I am happy with the current state of affairs, and an option to leave everything as it is could have been added.

In reply to The_

Juristis

11 years ago

Auto-translated

The_

The poll is not legitimate, the topic of blocking is not fully addressed; simply saying yes or no is not enough. It seems that if I vote to cancel the technical restrictions on blocking, I automatically agree to three consecutive turns with a blocked unit from the castle and a loss – I disagree with that.

I've been playing for 4 years and have never seen anything like this.

In reply to Juristis

The_

11 years ago

Auto-translated

Juristis

I've been playing for 4 years and have never seen anything like this.

I've been playing for a shorter time, but it's happened to me a couple of times. Even if it hadn't, is there a chance it could happen? - Yes, and it wouldn't be very pleasant to suffer such a defeat in an important stage of a tournament.

In reply to The_

Wicc

11 years ago

Auto-translated

The_

The poll is not legitimate, the topic of blocking is not fully covered; simply saying yes or no is not enough. It seems that if I vote to cancel the technical rule regarding blocking, I automatically agree to 3 consecutive generations with a block from the Castle and a loss – I don't agree with that. On the other hand, some changes to the rules can and perhaps should be made, but they should first be discussed, and the opinions of the majority who want to express themselves should be heard, rather than creating a poll after 12 hours of discussion. Now, people will just click on the checkboxes, and someone kind will then add this to the rules – no, thank you.
And the rest of the questionnaire looks more like a farce; for example, I am happy with the current state of affairs; you could have added an option to leave everything as it is.

The poll is fine; you're just not reading carefully.

The option "I want to keep the rule regarding blocking, but in a different wording" applies to the item "Keep the rule regarding blocking"; click there.

In the rest of the questionnaire, "the current state of affairs" is in the first lines, and the second and third lines are alternatives.

In reply to Wicc

scorp

11 years ago

Auto-translated

Wicc

It's too complicated; either allow it completely or don't bother with it. Just my opinion. If there are many who want intermediate options, that's fine.

I'm not against the Grail; I'm all for it – it's a good "unique feature," but it needs to be implemented appropriately. If there are no conditions for level 111, I would be against it; with conditions, I'm for it (I think you know why). For the CIS region, it can be implemented without any conditions.

KobRa_RR

11 years ago

Auto-translated

Well, maybe I exaggerated a bit about winning three in a row, but I have plenty of examples of winning two out of three.
And in your third game, you had Inferno against Necropolis and your opponent started with a Castle (an example from a real game today).

Dima Surmay

11 years ago

Auto-translated

Wicc

Decisions are made by a simple majority vote.

Sorry if I'm wrong, but where did you get the idea that the vote even has any power? And why a simple majority?

In reply to The_

Juristis

11 years ago

Auto-translated

The_

I play a bit less now, but it happened to me a couple of times. And even if it hadn't, is there a chance? - Yes, and it's not very pleasant to suffer such a defeat in an important stage of the tournament.

We have 113 restarts in our tournaments, which should be enough for 3 blocks.

In reply to scorp

Wicc

11 years ago

Auto-translated

scorp

I have nothing against the Grail, only in favor - it's a nice "highlight," but it needs to be properly regulated. If it's unconditional on 111, I'd be against it; with conditions - I'm FOR (I think you can guess why). On SNG - build it unconditionally.

I don't get it. What's so special about SNG? At the last two SNGs, we seemed to play strictly by HeroesWorld rules, didn't we?

In reply to KobRa_RR

Juristis

11 years ago

Auto-translated

KobRa_RR

Well, maybe he exaggerated a bit about three in a row, but I have plenty of examples of two out of three
And in your third game, you had Inferno against Necropolis and your opponent's starting Castle (an example from a real game today)

In that case, nothing will save you from being blocked.

In reply to Wicc

scorp

11 years ago

Auto-translated

Wicc

The poll is fine; you're just not reading carefully.

The option "I want to keep the reply on the thread, but in a different wording" applies to the "Keep the reply on the thread" option; click there.

What if he doesn't like the new wording of the reply on the thread and would prefer to cancel the reply altogether? (I'm probably just trolling now, though...)

In reply to Dima Surmay

Wicc

11 years ago

Auto-translated

Dima Surmay

Sorry if I'm wrong, but where did you get the idea that the vote actually has any weight? And why should it be decided by a simple majority?

Because this is a democracy. At least, that's how most players and organizers present it. I'm acting within this social model. If I'm wrong, that's fine, I'll know for next time.