Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
The poll is not legitimate, the issue of blocking is not fully addressed, and simply saying yes or no is not enough. It seems that if I vote to cancel the technical restrictions on blocking, I automatically agree to three consecutive turns with a blocking unit from a castle and a defeat – I don’t agree with that. On the other hand, some changes to the rules could be made, and perhaps even should be, but they should be discussed first, and the opinions of the majority who want to express themselves should be heard, rather than creating a poll after 12 hours of discussion. Now, people will just click on the options, and someone will kindly add it to the rules later – no thank you. And the rest of the questionnaire looks more like a farce. For example, I am happy with the current state of affairs, and an option to leave everything as it is could have been added.