Guys, where can I download the English version of Heroes?
Posts from Round table
https://drive.google.com/uc?id=0B6nbqRfhloIAWURKM3ZlTkVaclU&export=download
За то что нейтралы не бегают за единичкой, для меня это уже стоит того
Зима 2011-12.
Mefu or Taza?
Actually, who are these heroes?
Overall, Tazar. Greater priority in defense growth during level-ups. Consequently, over the long run, specialization makes more sense. The exception is small templates; in those, leading in early finals will give more of an advantage than armor specialization will.
Зима 2011-12.
Suddenly, the question arose: who should I choose – Mefu or Tazar?
If Tazar successfully passed level 3, then problems with further leveling up rarely occur. With Mefu, the situation is quite the opposite; they always try to force something.
Magic acquisition at level 4:
Tazar: Fire 0%, Air 17%, Water 33%, Earth 50%.
Mefala: Fire 0%, Air 14%, Water 43%, Earth 43%.
Зима 2011-12.
Kostyan, the growth is the same. And you described what I'm actually asking about: a bird with a leader or a random choice? For example, Pandora, from which you get a skill, and 2 skills to choose from. What do we take, stability or potential? I'll take the second one, even though I'll probably get into trouble.
Well, not exactly the same... Up to level 10, the Ranger has 35-45, and the Beastmaster has 30-50. Considering the higher percentage for earth/air - it's definitely Tazar. And also: there aren't many skills that are clearly worse than leadership that you can get at level 3, and their combined percentage is worth the risk.
Well, not exactly the same... Up to level 10, the Ranger has 35-45, and the Beastmaster has 30-50. Considering the higher percentage for earth/air – it's definitely Tazar. And also: there aren't many skills that are clearly worse than leadership that you can get at level 3, their combined percentage makes the risk worthwhile.
Зима 2011-12.
Wow!))) And here the question arises: which is better, a titmouse or a crane?))) I'm having trouble choosing. There's a choice between resistance/perception/literacy (which are clearly not better than leadership) and stable, but not always useful, leadership and the prospect of water.
Well, resistance is definitely not worse than leadership.
And if you analyze it, what is really worse: learning (4), first aid (6), perception (1), navigation (8), literacy (1), magic (1), diplomacy (1), mysticism (2), property (1). The numbers in parentheses indicate the probability of occurrence, totaling 25.
Now let's look at the probability of getting must-have skills: attack (5), logistics (8), earth (3), air (1), tactics (6), wisdom (2) - totaling 25.
The rest: archery (7), scouting (7), pathfinding (8), leadership (5), luck (2), ballistics (7), intelligence (1), water (2), artillery (8), resistance (5), totaling 52.
In general, the probability of getting two undesirable skills to choose from at the third level is quite low. If you play with probabilities, I would choose Tazar. However, not so long ago, there was a topic on the forum discussing skill tree builds, and if they are indeed fixed, then by figuring this out, we could put an end to this discussion.

UTC+03:00, icq 593626431
then they give junk up to level 5, and in the end, at level 5, you get Expert Armor and Tactics, and at level 6, you have to take Wisdom.
Added after 12 minutes
And also, a question. To calculate the probability of getting a bad skill at level 3 for Tazar, you need to understand what is considered a bad skill and what is considered a good skill?
What skills are you willing to take at level 2 instead of Expert Armor?
In terms of distributing secondary skills, there's a much higher chance of getting lucky, and there's also a clear advantage in terms of magic schools.
Sanin, Leadership will definitely be better because it will be useful in battles with neutrals, unlike resistance, which can simply be dispelled by a black orb on a Fortress.