Connection ErrorBad RequestSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
1. Argatha cannot be killed; he has protection. The shaman's words imply that the protection is gone. Where did this information come from? 2. Why must the troll necessarily eliminate Argatha? What threat does he pose? Did the Mafia identify the troll? Where did this information come from? 3. On the 2nd night, Alex was not blocked. This means he was targeted by the stone or the troll. There is a 50% chance that the Mafia identified the troll. But the shaman's words suggest that the troll is the one being targeted, not the stone.
In my opinion, this is enough to consider the shaman a Mafia member who has revealed himself.
Нефела
11 years ago
Auto-translated
Isn't it a bit odd that yesterday, Mentha was defended by the journalist who questioned him?
Interrogation: Are you a town member? No Are you Mafia? No Are you Arcanist? No If the first answer is a lie, then he is Town. If the second answer is a lie, then he is Mafia, but not Arcanist. If the third answer is a lie, then it's a logical fallacy. As you can see, the alibi is unreliable.In the third question, it was about a letter written in red ink. After seeing the questions from tonight, I became even more convinced that the question was specifically about the color of the role. Mafia roles are written in dark red.
SnowmanV2
11 years ago
Auto-translated
The third question was about a letter written in red ink. After seeing the questions for this round, I became even more convinced that the question was specifically about the color of the role. Mafia roles are written in dark red.
So, can the question only be answered with yes or no, right? And this is already a literary answer, I think. I doubt the question will be about the answer itself.
Нефела
11 years ago
Auto-translated
Not so much in defense of the Shaman, but out of curiosity.
Argata cannot be killed; he has protection. The shaman's words imply that the protection is gone. Where did you get this information?
Yashur, have you ever thought about what the Mafia do on long winter nights? They have as many as 3 night actions, of which we only see one – the kill. The blocker was killed by a troll on the second night. Among the actions not shown, they have healing and voice stealing from Ilfina, and redirection and berserk from Argata. What do you think the probability is that the Mafia simply don't use the opportunity of a third night action?
Maybe I'm wrong again...
1. Argatha cannot be killed; he has protection. The shaman's words suggest that the protection is gone. Where did this information come from? 2. Why must the troll necessarily eliminate Argatha? What makes him a threat? Did the mafia identify the troll? Where did this information come from? 3. On the second night, Alex was not blocked. This means he was targeted by the stone/troll. There is a 50% chance that the mafia exposed the troll. But the shaman's words suggest that the troll, not the stone, is the one being targeted.
In my opinion, this is enough to consider the shaman as a revealed mafia member.
And what, it's quite logical, I just didn't notice. Beat him:smile51:
Not so much in defense of the Shaman, but out of curiosity.
Yashur, have you ever wondered what the Mafia do on long winter nights? They have аж 3 night actions, of which we only see one – the kill. The blocker killed the townie on the second night. Among the actions not shown, they have healing and voice steal from Ilfina, and redirection and berserk from Argat. What do you think is the probability that the Mafia are simply not using the opportunity of a third night action? Maybe I'm wrong again...
Ehh... I don't quite understand what this is about...:confused: How is this related to what I wrote?
Added 3 minutes later Gekasan_RU
Hit him:smile51:
Then vote.;)
SnowmanV2
11 years ago
Auto-translated
How simple! And ingenious! Olam did a good job, gave a hint, and we, fools, didn't notice... Interrogation of Yashur: 1. Are you from the city? Yes 2. Are you a Mafia member? No 3. Are you loyal to Argat? (Are you Mafia in another way?) No If the first statement is a lie, then he is a troll because he is not from the city and not a Mafia member. If the second statement is true, then there is a logical error because he is Mafia, but not loyal to Argat. If the third statement is true, then he is loyal to Argat, but not a Mafia member. In conclusion... Execute Yashur
Interrogation of Yashur: 1. Are you from the city? Yes 2. Are you Mafia? No 3. Are you loyal to Argat? (Are you Mafia in another way?) No
Ment
Are the questions really exactly like that? )
10 characters...
SnowmanV2
11 years ago
Auto-translated
Definitely, the first and second ones, and the third one too, if you read the prefaces to the newspapers, are also easy to understand.
Added after 50 seconds
Moreover, the questions were the same back then, the cop was peaceful, the lizard was a troll.
After all, Olam isn't stupid enough to ask questions that could be compromising).
Ment
11 years ago
Auto-translated
In principle, if the questions clearly defined the respondent's stance, that would be quite logical...
