Forum — Tournament Committee

Lider1

11 years ago

Auto-translated

evil_romantic

Yes, that's my stance, and right now I see 4-5 people posting about how great the HW rules are, and 2 posts against it, and the ones posting against it are people with higher skill levels? So why should I implement it?

Do I understand correctly that you don't have your own opinion? Is the quantity of opinions (the crowd, the masses) and the personal authority of more skilled players important to you?

evil_romantic

What do my games have to do with it?

It's relevant because you're writing as if you're an expert, someone who has played hundreds of games with the ruleset, which I'm not sure about. If I'm wrong, I apologize.
Why would I need to play hundreds of games if all the changes that the ruleset provides can be read in its description? What it does and how.
Try reading the description and understanding what you've read, and you'll be an "expert" too.

Although, why bother reading anything. When 90% of the forum, including the strongest players, are playing with it, and it's officially enshrined in the rules, then maybe... Then I'll be "like everyone else." But right now, it's bad, and I don't even really know why. But it's bad. "My soul doesn't like it," "I don't like it" :D

злой_романтик

11 years ago

Auto-translated

Yeah, you're talking about one thing, and I'm talking about another...
Anyway, stick to your opinion, I won't write anything more on this topic, play with your rules, but don't bother me with them.

In reply to злой_романтик

Lider1

11 years ago

Auto-translated

evil_romantic

in general, stick to your opinion, I won't write anything more on this topic, play with the rules, but don't bother me with them.

This is such a loss for the game as a whole..

Your position on why you didn't want to was important, not trying to persuade you.

In reply to Lider1

злой_романтик

11 years ago

Auto-translated

Lider1

You're not that important. Whether you play or not is up to you. (unless it's Lucky George)

Now, you're a different story...:rolleyes:

In reply to злой_романтик

Lider1

11 years ago

Auto-translated

zloy_romantik

Now you're talking...:rolleyes:

Well, I'm a different story. It's obvious.

In reply to Lucky George

Dirty_Player

11 years ago

Auto-translated

Lucky George

Well, since the number of imp statues has horribly filled the treasure zones, you can do without checkmarks, and let it generate whatever it wants on Jebus Cross!)

What nonsense is this about the number of imp statues? Has anyone done a sample? Is there any statistics? The ХВ patch without checkmarks cannot possibly affect map generation.

In reply to Dirty_Player

Lucky George

11 years ago

Auto-translated

Dirty_Player

What nonsense is this about the number of imps? Did anyone do a sampling? Is there any statistics? The HeroesWorld patch without checkboxes cannot possibly affect map generation.

It would indeed be interesting to see the statistics, or to hear about how HeroesWorld rules introduces imbalance.

Juristis

11 years ago

Auto-translated

The level of romantic obsession is increasing exponentially. And he used to be a normal guy.

In reply to Juristis

злой_романтик

11 years ago

Auto-translated

Juristis

The romantic's eccentricity is growing exponentially. But he used to be a normal guy.

How can I ever reach the level of the "most promising" one? He's just so normal: rolleyes:

Iamsamstan

11 years ago

Auto-translated

Why are you all ganging up on Roman like a bunch of thugs? Give arguments, answer who you even are here. He doesn't want to play with ХВ rules, that's his business. I don't want to either, simply because it means extra discussions and a waste of time. If you play with checkboxes, an extra 5 mills on respawn or leprechauns has a bigger impact than obelisks. If you play without the checkbox, then why press Enter a few more times when loading? It's fine as it is. Let everyone play the way they want — Heroes is not a job. Also, if I'm not mistaken, using scrolls against neutrals is allowed by default, so only Explosion falls under the ban, since specialists can already use their profane 4th level spells. In short, it's all pointless walls of text IMHO.

In reply to Iamsamstan

Dirty_Player

11 years ago

Auto-translated

Iamsamstan

Again, if I'm not mistaken, scrolls can be used against neutral creatures by default.

Why is that suddenly possible?

In reply to Dirty_Player

Iamsamstan

11 years ago

Auto-translated

Dirty_Player

Why would that be possible?

Oh, I see, I made a mistake. I just thought it only applied to the opponent.

In reply to Iamsamstan

Vatya

11 years ago

Auto-translated

Iamsamstan

oh, so I was wrong) I just thought it only applied to the opponent)

That's what the "report" function is for. And it's much easier to press Enter once than to keep track of where and what you violated. But if you enjoy losing to a 231-round rush with just one centaur, then good luck...

In reply to Vatya

Iamsamstan

11 years ago

Auto-translated

Vatya

That's what HWRulez is for. And it's much easier to press Enter once than to keep track of what you've violated. But if you enjoy losing to a 1 Centaur with a 231 Redram, then good luck...

Well, for starters, my games never lasted longer than 4-5 weeks because I don't play like those who clear the map as much as possible and then only attack the opponent.

In reply to Vatya

Diabler

11 years ago

Auto-translated

Vatya

That's what HWRules is for. And it's much easier to press Enter once than to keep track of what you've violated. But if you enjoy losing to a 1 Centaur with a 231 Red Rush, then good luck...

Well, even HWRules can't save you from a Red Rush.

Reading content in

Interface language

Posts from Forum

Statistics

Library

Users Online 6 users 1293 guests

Today's Visitors 13