Posts from One for all and all for one - 3
Maybe 5 players on each team would be better. There are to many captains as it is now imho. With 5 players we would have more even matchups. Would also give more teamspirit.
R55Max, is the goal to simply mark that a tournament has been held, or is the goal to create balanced teams!?
Regarding the balance of the teams. The concept of creating balanced teams is very subjective, and to eliminate this subjectivity, a rating is introduced, which has its own purely mathematical assessment.
To Maretti: 12 teams of 5 players is too few teams. In general, ideally, there would be 80 participants and 16 teams of 5 players. But we have few participants.
I don't quite understand how the captains will choose their players, technically speaking? Will it be in Skype, ICQ, on a stream, or somewhere else?
According to the table, u2noob voted for himself.
Yes, that's true. u2noob voted for himself, and I didn't notice. Luckily, this was an isolated incident, and this vote doesn't affect the ranking of the captains.
But is it okay that some players intentionally voted against those who deserved to be captains, and instead voted for someone else?
лето 2012.
Why are you so fixated on this draft? Two tournaments have already been played with it, and nothing has changed – they were still playing. It would be better to introduce a chess timer:smile15:
I suggest that the organizers really rework the captain selection process so that the draft of players for the second group of captains starts from the bottom of the list, and the draft of players for the third group starts from the top of the list of captains; that would be fairer.
I'm saying this as a less motivated and interested captain, since I'm in the middle of the list:cool:
So, picking first from the third tier is much more preferable, but that's just my opinion.
And R55 has already written three times that the rules will not change, and very emphatically at that.
icq 667277468
Discord Iamsamstan#6087

