Skip to content

Posts from One for all and all for one - 3

2.0 (1 rating)
Announcement
User Avatar
Auto-translated
Tournament standings.
Воздам сторицей!
In reply to Diabler
Its better to choose from the 2nd basket first because its better known players and therefore easier to know who is best.

Maybe 5 players on each team would be better. There are to many captains as it is now imho. With 5 players we would have more even matchups. Would also give more teamspirit.
In reply to Roger-ua
User Avatar
Auto-translated
Roger-ua
R55Max, is the goal to simply mark that a tournament has been held, or is the goal to create balanced teams!?
The goal is to hold a tournament with the current regulations. Specifically, the players vote for the captains, and the seeding is based on the Hv rating. This is the key format for team selection, and it cannot and will not be discussed. After reading the regulations, is it still unclear to you? You've played in the tournament twice already...

Regarding the balance of the teams. The concept of creating balanced teams is very subjective, and to eliminate this subjectivity, a rating is introduced, which has its own purely mathematical assessment.


To Maretti: 12 teams of 5 players is too few teams. In general, ideally, there would be 80 participants and 16 teams of 5 players. But we have few participants.
МУДРЫЙ - не обязательно старый, ОПЫТНЫЙ - не обязательно мудрый... обладатель и того и другого всегда должен помнить слова НАПОЛЕОНА БОНАПАРТА: Война состоит из непредусмотренных событий; В каждом большом деле всегда приходится какую-то часть оставить на долю :smile33: СЛУЧАЯ...
In reply to R55Max
User Avatar
Auto-translated
I don't quite understand how the captains will choose their players – technically, how will it work? Will it be on Skype, ICQ, on a stream, or somewhere else?
ICQ: 564224919
In reply to Toganash
User Avatar
Auto-translated
Toganash
I don't quite understand how the captains will choose their players, technically speaking? Will it be in Skype, ICQ, on a stream, or somewhere else?
It says it will be in a conference call on Skype.
In reply to Dirty_Player
User Avatar
Auto-translated
According to the table, u2noob voted for himself.
ICQ 423164784

In reply to Sanin
User Avatar
Auto-translated
Sanin
According to the table, u2noob voted for himself.
Yes, that's true. u2noob voted for himself, and I didn't notice. Luckily, this is an isolated case, and this vote doesn't affect the ranking of the captains.
Воздам сторицей!
In reply to Roger DAltavilla
Auto-translated
Roger DAltavilla
Yes, that's true. u2noob voted for himself, and I didn't notice. Luckily, this was an isolated incident, and this vote doesn't affect the ranking of the captains.
But is it okay that there are players who deliberately voted not for those who deserve to be captains, but rather against them?
In reply to Dima Surmay
User Avatar
Auto-translated
Dima Surmay
But is it okay that some players intentionally voted against those who deserved to be captains, and instead voted for someone else?
This is not prohibited.
Воздам сторицей!
In reply to Roger DAltavilla
User Avatar
Auto-translated
I suggest that the organizers really rework the captain selection process so that the picking of players for the second group of captains starts from the bottom of the list, and the picking of players for the third group starts from the top of the list of captains; that would be fairer. I'm saying this as a less motivated and less interested captain, since I'm in the middle of the list:cool:

лето 2012.
In reply to Dark
Auto-translated
Why are you so fixated on this draft? Two tournaments have already been played with it, and nothing has changed – they were still playing. It would be better to introduce a chess timer:smile15:
In reply to Dark
User Avatar
Auto-translated
darkello
I suggest that the organizers really rework the captain selection process so that the draft of players for the second group of captains starts from the bottom of the list, and the draft of players for the third group starts from the top of the list of captains; that would be fairer.
I'm saying this as a less motivated and interested captain, since I'm in the middle of the list:cool:
++. That makes more sense.
ICQ 627769385
In reply to Nitro
User Avatar
Auto-translated
The second tier looks more balanced; I don't think there will be a significant difference between who picks fifth from the beginning or fifth from the end. However, in the third tier, the difference is very noticeable – BloodDriver, Maradjan, Evil, etc. – they are simply not on the same level as the players from the "Novichok" tier.
So, picking first from the third tier is much more preferable, but that's just my opinion.
And R55 has already written three times that the rules will not change, and very emphatically at that.
В этом мире есть только две действительно бесконечные вещи - вселенная и глупость, при чем на счет первой я не уверен...©
icq 667277468
In reply to SP_SkyLine
User Avatar
Auto-translated
I agree with the previous speaker. The second tier is balanced, but the third tier is not at all. The player who picks first from the third tier will have an advantage, in my opinion, this is obvious. But that's just the rules, and there are rules.
241-568-808
In reply to The_
Auto-translated
Well, balance in the 3rd bracket is unattainable because it’s impossible to find 20 equally skilled players; this requires sending out invitations for a tournament. The only thing I think is that Juanito from the 2nd bracket should be replaced with someone like Evil, y2nub, Maharaja, or Bloody Driver.
435-191-039
Discord Iamsamstan#6087

Statistics