Auto-translated
Agreeing on a draw a week before the end of the tournament and claiming there isn't enough time to finish the game, I think it's clear what's going on here.
yeah, now you definitely won't catch up to us in points!:smile05:
New here? I'm Roha — want a quick tour?
Agreeing on a draw a week before the end of the tournament and claiming there isn't enough time to finish the game, I think it's clear what's going on here.
Agreeing on a draw a week before the end of the tour and claiming there isn't enough time to finish the game, I think it's clear what's going on here.
To be honest, I can't understand. What's it to you how and when we played, and who gave you the right to judge whether we had enough time or not?
Maybe you have something to do with our game?
Or maybe, because of us, you're not getting into the main stage?
I became interested in your game because I initially thought that a deal had been made, and as it turned out, that was the case. And I don't want dishonest people to advance to the next stage, or even just get points.
P.S. If we are allowed to arrange draws or give away wins through agreements, then I have no objections to you.
P.S. If we are allowed to describe draws or agree on giving up a victory, I wouldn't mind at all.
yeah, now you definitely won't catch up to us in points!:smile05:
Yes, yes, and if the saves aren't provided, then ban everyone...
5. Saves from all games must be kept until the end of the tournament and presented upon first request from the tournament organizers or any member of the Arbitration Committee (AK).
If a situation is not regulated by the rules, the judges are guided by elementary logic and gaming ethics.
This situation has already been discussed in another tournament, even at the level of the Tournament Committee members, and the outcome remained the same.
Could you clarify the procedure? For example, a moderator or a member of the Arbitration Committee addresses the players with a request to provide game saves. Players are obliged to provide saves upon first request. If there are no saves, and the players provide nothing, what happens then? Are they not held responsible for this?
The AC does not consider hypothetical situations.
Since there isn't even a controversial situation yet, there's nothing to consider. There's a point in the rules, and I just want to understand what will happen if it's violated.
07/26/2014 BISHOP (Blue, Rampart, Kair, Kair) drew =Stinger= (Red, Fortress, Tazar, Tazar) Mini-Nostalgia 145
I confirm.
For the truth-seekers - there was a game, and there were even spectators at the M200 tournament in Moscow, where they played this game in parallel, but since a lot of time has passed and much has been forgotten, plus there is not much time for replaying, and it's a pity to waste the time spent on the game - they decided to commit a crime and arrange a fixed match.
Guys, you might not realize it, but you are role models for many, many players in the third installment of the Heroes series. And these players might decide that "if even the idols do it, why can't I?" and will be "right." For me personally, such maneuvers at this stage ruin the competitive intrigue in the tournament. This applies to Red and Kilgore as well. The first and second players, by the way, in the round before the final. You can be offended by me, but if you do this, at least attach the save files and passwords to such "reports"!