Connection ErrorBad RequestSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Knowing English well is a sign of being a normal person. Not knowing English means being a retard, unworthy of existence. It's simple, and there's nothing elite about it.
That's a bit harsh, Mornie. Not everyone has the opportunity to learn it, especially when half the population lives in villages, and even then, in remote areas. If you're talking about a city, then maybe, but even there, not everyone has conversational skills, and those who do have usually been to America or communicate with Americans.
Смысла нет, но вы держитесь там. Удачи, здоровья, хорошего настроения! И пока в кармане пачка милкиуэйев - значит все не так уж плохо на сегодняшний день
No, it should be like this: NOOB CARTAGIST PIGS, I AM FROM COLD AND BEAUTIFUL RUSSIA, SO YOU SHOULD TAKE OVER YOUR COUNTRY TO PRAISE IT RED JUST LIKE MY FAVORITE BORSCH!
That's a bit harsh, Mornie. Not everyone has the opportunity to learn it, especially when half the population lives in villages, and even then, not everyone knows how to speak it fluently. If you're talking about the city, then maybe, but even there, not everyone is fluent, only those who have been to America or communicate with Americans.
I'm a country bumpkin, but I don't have any problems! You just need to put in a little effort at school.
and you know, I have every right to make my mark in the first category. I'm studying to be a translator at university, and I didn't get a single "B" during the summer session. So... it's more likely that you underestimate women's abilities.
Grades aren't always an indicator of knowledge, and our professor told us that too. He was an excellent student himself. As for learning English, it's necessary when you need it, especially for a technical university where most of the descriptions of datasheets (microcontroller descriptions) and other things are written in English. It's useful to know. And as our physics teacher said: "My head isn't a trash can," you need to know what will be useful.
Your physics professor probably only knows physics because he's been teaching the same material to students for the past forty years. And yet, he can still remember all the champions of the Soviet Union in football, starting from 1950.
Your physicist probably only knows physics because he's been teaching the same thing to students for the last forty years. And yet, he remembers all the champions of the USSR in football starting from 1950.
What a small world! And whether someone is knowledgeable or not depends on how much time they dedicate to it. Leonard Euler began to deeply study mathematics at the age of 13, and at 16 he already had his first award; Mikhail Lomonosov began to study on his own at the age of 16, and in his later years, he laid the foundation for the molecular theory of matter; Lev Landau was a graduate student at the age of 19, a great man. And Einstein is popular only because he created a nuclear warhead for the Americans; he is not such a great scientist.
Einstein is popular only because he helped the Americans create a nuclear warhead; he's not that great of a scientist.
An interesting statement. So, you're saying he received the Nobel Prize for helping the Americans create a nuclear bomb? )) To make the irony clear, I'll say that Einstein received the Nobel Prize much earlier and not for that reason, and that he was only indirectly involved in the development of the nuclear bomb.
An interesting statement. So, in your opinion, he received the Nobel Prize for creating the atomic bomb for the Americans? ))
He received the Nobel Prize for the photoelectric effect; he borrowed the theory of relativity from someone (I don't remember who, so he didn't receive it for the theory of relativity). It's like a cheater in Heroes. And the Americans praised him a lot and glorified him for that bomb.
He received the Nobel Prize for the photoelectric effect.
Almost true. In reality, it was for the photoelectric effect. But what's wrong with that? Is it not a serious achievement?
He borrowed the theory of relativity from someone.
Special relativity? Yes, it's based on Lorentz transformations, although that's more of a mathematical tool, and here we're talking about physical applications. But the theory of relativity also includes general relativity. Would you mind explaining from whom general relativity was borrowed?
And the Americans praised him a lot for that bomb and glorified him.
For what did they praise him? He was almost against its creation. And he wasn't even part of the team that created the bomb. There were other scientists involved, including such well-known ones as Fermi.
Что?
Happy Life
