Auto-translated
Yanukovych is no longer legitimate.
Today, 17:25:00 World about us | comment
The worst-case scenario is unfolding right before our eyes. Ukrainians are being attacked by police, the military, and their own president. The fact is that Ukrainian society has been peacefully protesting in the streets for three months, and these are not "rioters," "provocateurs," or "terrorists," as Ukrainian and Russian authorities claim. An outraged society is demanding a change of government and a revision of the constitution to limit the powers of the ruthless head of state, who refuses to discuss a compromise.
Yanukovych is no longer legitimate.
Since November of last year, hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians have taken to the streets in almost all of the country's major cities, and millions of activists are working online. To save his own skin and wallet, President Viktor Yanukovych ordered the crowd to be fired upon. On February 19, he announced the start of a large-scale anti-terrorist operation throughout the country, involving all armed forces and law enforcement agencies. He bears all responsibility for the bloodshed and the loss of human lives. He is playing a high-stakes game because he feels supported by the Kremlin. If it were not for the direct political, economic, and police intervention of the Russian authorities, the President of Ukraine would have resigned long ago or appointed an acting prime minister in agreement with the opposition. He has already led the country to a socio-economic catastrophe, and now he is dragging it towards a humanitarian crisis with the death of many people.
All of society is calling for compromise.
Viktor Yanukovych has lost the legitimacy that he gained from the 2010 elections. He lacks the courage to negotiate, to accept the limitations of a small dictatorship in a large country with a population of 46 million. The president first pretends to be open and invites opposition members to discussions, and then backtracks and issues ultimatums. He has buried any possibility of a measured solution based on mutual concessions from both sides of the barricades.
However, all of Ukrainian society is calling for compromise. All the churches in the country condemned the use of force: such a statement was made not only by the Greek Catholic Church but also by Metropolitan Volodymyr, head of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the Moscow Patriarchate. Many religious leaders have spoken out since the beginning of the anti-government protests in Maidan. They were certainly able to influence Prime Minister Azarov, who resigned in January of this year. In addition, after Azarov's departure, ministers should have focused on solving current problems. However, the Minister of Internal Affairs de facto introduced a state of emergency in the country. Political parties, with the support of the Maidan People's Committee, tried to continue the political dialogue even after the fierce clashes in January. People's committees were also formed in other Ukrainian cities. This is most active in the west of the country, but they can also be found in large cities in the east.
Viktor Yanukovych has been playing a cunning game for more than a month. He makes promises, agrees to talk for hours with representatives of the opposition, the head of European diplomacy, Catherine Ashton, and other prominent figures. He even fooled the leaders of the European Union, promising back in 2012 to sign an association agreement with Brussels, which he then unilaterally refused to do without discussion with the Ukrainian parliament and businesses. The purpose of the agreement was to strengthen trade ties and exchange of goods; it was only one of the stages on the way to joining the European Union. That is, it was not a choice between Russia and Europe, but about increasing Ukraine's chances of getting out of the economic hole.
Three reasons for the escalation of tensions.
So, why did the clashes resume on February 18 and become much more violent than before? There were three reasons for this. The first is the hypocrisy of the compliant deputies, who live at the expense of the corrupt regime. The majority of deputies refused to fulfill their promise to discuss and adopt amendments to the constitution in order to return to the previous system with a limitation of the powers of the head of state.
Secondly, on February 17, two main opposition leaders, Vitali Klitschko and Arseniy Yatsenyuk, met with Chancellor Merkel in Berlin. The governments of European states and the European Commission made new proposals for emergency financial assistance to Kyiv, which should prevent the collapse of the budget and the national currency.
The third and main reason for the decision to drown the protesters in blood is Moscow's policy. At the opening of the Winter Olympic Games in Sochi, Viktor Yanukovych met with his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin. The Ukrainian leader returned home full of confidence. On February 17, Moscow issued an ultimatum to Kyiv: a new tranche of 2 billion dollars will be transferred immediately after the "cleansing" of Maidan. Viktor Yanukovych obeyed.
All of Europe must speak and act.
To create a basis for the operation on February 18, it was necessary to intensify propaganda against the protesters, to present them as an aggressive and disorganized group that is being manipulated from abroad. The words "criminals," "terrorists," and "fascists" began to appear on official Ukrainian and Russian channels. The plan was to convince European public opinion that the responsibility for the bloodshed lies with the outraged crowd, and not with Yanukovych and his people. This lie must be stopped, and the truth must be restored. Europe, all Europeans, must speak and act.
The fact is that Ukraine is not on the edge of the world, but in Europe, as is Russia. Thus, it can potentially become part of the European space, which is being built around the concepts of law, peace, free trade, and the protection of freedoms. Why agree to the Russian dictate, which implies that any statements from Europe and the United States represent a "violence-inducing intervention"?
The EU and our governments have always defended the sovereignty of Ukraine and its ability to exist as a full-fledged state in mutual understanding with its neighbors. Yanukovych is no longer a legitimate representative of Ukraine and its people. And Putin even more so. The European Parliament needs a permanent presence in Kyiv. Even a few deputies can stop the repressive machine.
Mari Mandra