Skip to content

Posts from The Hunger Games

No ratings yet — be the first to rate!
Closed
Let's choose the best time for playing!
55 voters
Multiple choice Public votes Closed 2013-08-10
This poll is closed.
16/8/1
40% 22 votes
16/4/1
20% 11 votes
16/4/2
12.7% 7 votes
12/06/01
12.7% 7 votes
10/5/1
10.9% 6 votes
It’s all nonsense; we need another option.
10.9% 6 votes
User Avatar
#198
Auto-translated
That's also cool, but playing with three people isn't the same as playing with four; the interaction is completely different.
Только в тишине ответит вселенная, только в наших сердцах мы обретем смелость следовать её зову. ;)
In reply to kalababa
User Avatar
#199
Auto-translated
kalababa
How do you choose castles and colors if there are 3 people in the group?

We didn't discuss this, but since this difficulty arose, here's a possible solution: find a 4th person and have them participate in the drawing, then the person who just drew leaves, and the rest take their places based on the drawing.

Added 2 minutes later
Pyre
That's also interesting, but playing with three people is not the same as playing with four; the interaction is completely different.
I agree, the beginning was a bit rough, but I think it will be interesting going forward.
Удача любит подготовленных!!!





Стримы и обучение тут:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWlnXU5R5RLCMuWzIpBc65Q
User Avatar
#200
Auto-translated
u2noob seems to be hinting something to Yegor Korobeynikov!
User Avatar
#201
3: The_, Gomunguls, Javdet
Fuck yeah!
241-568-808
User Avatar
#202
Auto-translated
It will be very interesting to see groups 8 and 16.
In reply to Gomunguls
User Avatar
#204
Auto-translated
The draw seems rigged:confused: assigning participants in a 1-in-group manner isn't ideal, especially considering that both the host and the judge are participating, meaning there are interested parties involved...
In reply to Redwhait
User Avatar
#205
Auto-translated
Redwhait HP
The draw seems rigged :confused: assigning participants in a 1-to-1 ratio to groups isn't ideal, especially considering that both the host and the judge are participating, meaning there are interested parties involved...

We decided to do it this way; I don't see any benefit in doing it any other way...
Удача любит подготовленных!!!





Стримы и обучение тут:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWlnXU5R5RLCMuWzIpBc65Q
In reply to Gomunguls
#206
Auto-translated
Gomunguls
We choose the timer as the average of the votes, and it will be - 16/6/1.
The formula for calculating the average is interesting. :) They suggested a weighted average timer, down to the second (the mod allows it) - that would be original.
Message from Dirty_Player
It will be very interesting to see groups 8 and 16.
What was the catch? And why didn't you provide the host with the technical means for the draw and the formula for calculating the weighted average?
In reply to Gomunguls
User Avatar
#207
Auto-translated
Gomunguls
We decided to do it this way, and I don't see any benefit at all...
As for me, I see a benefit, at least for you (and maybe even for Pete), and I think this is an incompetent approach to the draw.
#208
Auto-translated
And one more small remark. It will save you from many problems.
There is a website called RANDOM.ORG that generates various “random” things. One of its panels has – List Randomizer
http://www.random.org/lists/, where you can work with lists. That is, there’s no need for any hassle with chat rooms. Here, you insert a list of cities, click, and get the result for the participants. The same can be done with colors. The result is even displayed with a timestamp. Well, and no one would stop anyone from adding a timer.


and what we get after

Attachments 2
2 files attached • Total size: 54.0 KB
In reply to Redwhait
User Avatar
#209
Auto-translated
Redwhait HP
I, for example, see a benefit, at least for you (and maybe even for Pete), and I think this is an incompetent approach to the draw.
So, what's the benefit? It seems like you're one of those who likes to complicate things... We're not trying to make things more complicated; we're trying to play in this format for the first time... to have fun and not just focus on the result, although winning would be nice too...
Since it's not that easy to run in this format, we're trying to make the game as comfortable as possible. If something doesn't suit someone, I can add that everything is voluntary here. If the inconveniences make you not want to participate, just let us know, and we'll figure it out...
Удача любит подготовленных!!!





Стримы и обучение тут:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCWlnXU5R5RLCMuWzIpBc65Q
User Avatar
#210
Auto-translated
we took a simpler approach: each player flipped a coin 5 times, and whoever got more "1"s got to choose first from the 4 castles, then the next player, and so on. In the end: red Rampart (Defiant) vs. blue Necropolis (Dimast) vs. brown Stronghold (kalababa).
User Avatar
#211
Auto-translated
Kalababa, they tricked you; there can't be more than 1 in a coin!
In reply to HellLighT
#212
Auto-translated
And yesterday, we still agreed to write down 2 cities each, we're playing iamsamstan ramp, Slayzer castle, and Diabler tower. Here are my initial impressions. Timer 16/6/1 - excellent, I don't know how it will be after the Grand Order, but for 116, it's enough and even more, we move quickly, and it seems like we have time for everything. We started around 0:59 AM, and by the time we saved at 2:55 AM, we had played 116 turns. Thanks to the guys, so if we don't mess around, the timer might even be reduced, but I'll write about that after the game. Weak monsters - it's tough! It's difficult to level up; we have to crush everything and everyone. Otherwise, everything is great so far; I'm looking forward to continuing our game.
435-191-039
Discord Iamsamstan#6087