Auto-translated
Please accept me as a participant. =)
682868768
682868768
New here? I'm Roha — want a quick tour?
Please tell me, will this rule, "Players can agree on a convenient time, but if they cannot reach an agreement, the critical time for the game is the night from Saturday to Sunday of the first week," change? I would gladly participate in such a tournament, but if a common time cannot be found, I won't be able to play at night. Perhaps you could make the game time mandatory for the evening of the weekend?
I disagree – for example, my weekends are Monday and Tuesday, so I can't always play in the evenings, and night is the most suitable time, and I don't think it's critical to stay up one night.
I agree with both Monday and Tuesday evenings, but evening, not night.
This makes everything much more complicated, and I don't see the point. Our main goal is to fight and have one winner, so why do we need coefficients?
Personally, I can't imagine what I'll do when such a game starts. Where should I run, and is it worth it, and where should I start?... and you're talking about coefficients!
the main thing here is to avoid players from the same quartet playing together for more than one match, except for the final, of course, otherwise there will be no alliances)
the organizer needs to think about how to prevent most of the games in the tournament from turning into 2vs2 or 2 vs 1+1 matches
The participants should think about this.
and the participants too) but I think there is still a difference when even, say, 2 players simply maintain neutrality towards each other, and when 2 players deliberately try to destroy a third :) there are quite a few aspects that need to be specified in the rules, some people may just want to play without joining any alliances or teaming up with anyone, while others may agree with a fairly strong player before the tournament starts to play as a team)
they might agree, for example, that Gomunguls and Maretti will play as a team and will win round after round against the others :)
and the participants too) but I think there is still a difference when even, say, 2 players simply maintain neutrality towards each other, and when 2 players deliberately try to eliminate a third player :) there are quite a few aspects that need to be specified in the rules; some people may just want to play without joining any alliances or teaming up with anyone, while others may agree with a fairly strong player before the tournament starts to play as a team)
they might agree, for example, that Gomunguls and Maretti will play as a team and will dominate round after round against the others :)
and the participants too), but I think there is still a difference when even, say, 2 players simply maintain neutrality towards each other, and when 2 players deliberately try to eliminate a third player. There are quite a few aspects that need to be specified in the rules; some people may just want to play without joining any alliances or teaming up with anyone, while others may agree with a strong player before the tournament starts to play as a team.
They might agree, for example, that Gomunguls and Maretti will play as a team and will dominate round after round against the others.