Skip to content

Posts from The Hunger Games

No ratings yet — be the first to rate!
Closed
Let's choose the best time for playing!
55 voters
Multiple choice Public votes Closed 2013-08-10
This poll is closed.
16/8/1
40% 22 votes
16/4/1
20% 11 votes
16/4/2
12.7% 7 votes
12/06/01
12.7% 7 votes
10/5/1
10.9% 6 votes
It’s all nonsense; we need another option.
10.9% 6 votes
In reply to Nestor86
Auto-translated
Please accept me as a participant. =)
682868768
User Avatar
Auto-translated
Could you please tell me if this rule will remain unchanged: "Players can agree on a convenient time, but if they cannot reach an agreement, the critical time for the game is the night from Saturday to Sunday of the first week." I would gladly participate in such a tournament, but if a common time cannot be found, I won't be able to play at night. Perhaps you could make the game time mandatory for the evening of the weekend?
icq - 630185572
In reply to Akmid
User Avatar
Auto-translated
Akmid
Please tell me, will this rule, "Players can agree on a convenient time, but if they cannot reach an agreement, the critical time for the game is the night from Saturday to Sunday of the first week," change? I would gladly participate in such a tournament, but if a common time cannot be found, I won't be able to play at night. Perhaps you could make the game time mandatory for the evening of the weekend?
I disagree - for example, my weekends are Monday and Tuesday, so I can't always play in the evenings, and night is the most suitable time, and I don't think staying up one night is critical.
296524052
Весна 2012.
In reply to злой_романтик
User Avatar
Auto-translated
evil_romantic
I disagree – for example, my weekends are Monday and Tuesday, so I can't always play in the evenings, and night is the most suitable time, and I don't think it's critical to stay up one night.

I agree with either Monday or Tuesday evening, but not night.
icq - 630185572
In reply to Akmid
User Avatar
Auto-translated
Akmid
I agree with both Monday and Tuesday evenings, but evening, not night.
You're fine with it, but what about the others? :) Okay, I think a compromise can always be found.
296524052
Весна 2012.
Auto-translated
application to participate
zloy_geka
654370340
I only play on weekdays from 9 AM to 5 PM Moscow time.
In reply to Gomunguls
User Avatar
Auto-translated
Gomunguls
This makes everything much more complicated, and I don't see the point. Our main goal is to fight and have one winner, so why do we need coefficients?
Personally, I can't imagine what I'll do when such a game starts. Where should I run, and is it worth it, and where should I start?... and you're talking about coefficients!
So, they are not needed for this, and there will be slightly fewer betrayals and alliances than one might expect at the moment.

лето 2012.
Auto-translated
The main goal here is to prevent players from the same quartet from playing together for more than one match, except for the final, of course; otherwise, there will be no alliances).
435-191-039
Discord Iamsamstan#6087
In reply to Iamsamstan
Auto-translated
Iamsamstan
the main thing here is to avoid players from the same quartet playing together for more than one match, except for the final, of course, otherwise there will be no alliances)
pffffffff, use ICQ for help.
Когда рестартов не осталось, обязательно ждите Гурниссона без балисты:D

Комплимент который сделал мой день:
Катя ЭПИК барышня) вы бы видели как пялились на её сиськи молодёж) я та с девушкой был) но всё равно пялился ) потому что хорошие) (с) Browser

Слабая раздача, которую заиграл исключительно из-за колпака на 111. (с) Сатир

User Avatar
Auto-translated
the organizer needs to think about how to prevent most of the games in the tournament from turning into 2vs2 or 2 vs 1+1 matches.
In reply to Encellad
User Avatar
Auto-translated
Encellad
the organizer needs to think about how to prevent most of the games in the tournament from turning into 2vs2 or 2 vs 1+1 matches
The participants should think about this.
In reply to Dirty_Player
User Avatar
Auto-translated
Dirty_Player
The participants should think about this.

and the participants too) but I think there is still a difference when even, say, 2 players simply maintain neutrality towards each other, and when 2 players deliberately try to eliminate a third player. There are quite a few aspects that should be specified in the rules; some may just want to play without joining any alliances or teaming up with anyone, while others may agree with a strong player before the tournament starts to play as a team.
They might agree, for example, that Gomunguls and Maretti will play as a team and will dominate round after round.
In reply to Encellad
Auto-translated
Encellad
and the participants too) but I think there is still a difference when even, say, 2 players simply maintain neutrality towards each other, and when 2 players deliberately try to destroy a third :) there are quite a few aspects that need to be specified in the rules, some people may just want to play without joining any alliances or teaming up with anyone, while others may agree with a fairly strong player before the tournament starts to play as a team)
they might agree, for example, that Gomunguls and Maretti will play as a team and will win round after round against the others :)

You just forgot the main detail, the winner is number 1.
icq - 630493876

Лето 2013.
In reply to Encellad
User Avatar
Auto-translated
Encellad
and the participants too) but I think there is still a difference when even, say, 2 players simply maintain neutrality towards each other, and when 2 players deliberately try to eliminate a third player :) there are quite a few aspects that need to be specified in the rules; some people may just want to play without joining any alliances or teaming up with anyone, while others may agree with a fairly strong player before the tournament starts to play as a team)
they might agree, for example, that Gomunguls and Maretti will play as a team and will dominate round after round against the others :)
No changes are needed – this is how the tournament is designed; if you can't negotiate (outsmart), then... die:smile16:
296524052
Весна 2012.
In reply to Encellad
Auto-translated
Encellad
and the participants too), but I think there is still a difference when even, say, 2 players simply maintain neutrality towards each other, and when 2 players deliberately try to eliminate a third player. There are quite a few aspects that need to be specified in the rules; some people may just want to play without joining any alliances or teaming up with anyone, while others may agree with a strong player before the tournament starts to play as a team.
They might agree, for example, that Gomunguls and Maretti will play as a team and will dominate round after round against the others.
That's what I meant in my previous post: the composition of the 4-player team should always be different, if possible, so that there are no such agreements, rather than pairs from one group of four against pairs from another.
435-191-039
Discord Iamsamstan#6087

Statistics