Jebus Cross - 3 — Tournament History online

злой_романтик

13 years ago

Auto-translated

Chingis

who are archers?

I haven't played much as Necropolis. And ranged units were difficult even in later stages.

Who are archers? :eek: Patstalom :D
For Necropolis, this is the main difficulty, but simple archers didn't miss and hit where they needed to - against golems.

Stryfe

13 years ago

Auto-translated

Chingis

who are Archi?

You shouldn't have joked:D

R55Max

13 years ago

Auto-translated

Chingis

Question:), and how were these violations discovered?:)

By the method of detection. You're next in line if you decide to play in the tournament, and by the way, I'll also immediately appeal for your ban so that you don't dare to make bold statements about violations of the rules.

Defiant vs Amiloo:

Player Defiant violated the rule, disqualified from the tournament.

P.S. Dear participants, read the rules, and follow them!

To Amiloo:
I understand your nobility, but you shouldn't forgive violations, as you will only make things worse.

In reply to R55Max

Pyre

13 years ago

Auto-translated

R55Max

GUNAR vs d-neez:
Player Torrente violated the rule regarding fort healing.
Disqualified from the tournament.

What is "fort healing"?

R55Max

13 years ago

Auto-translated

5.5. Visiting the Mapmakers and Fort on the Hill is prohibited.

Hill Fort is an English word commonly used in expressions.

Grando

13 years ago

Auto-translated

:smile13: :smile08:

What did Defiant do?

In reply to Grando

Defiant

13 years ago

Auto-translated

Oldboy

:smile13: :smile08:

and what did Defiant do?

Solmir, chain lighting, 3 GM.

Javdet

13 years ago

Auto-translated

Will there be public punishment with whips for violating the rule about staggered guard positions?

In reply to R55Max

rebellious

13 years ago

Auto-translated

R55Max

Player Defiant broke a rule, disqualified from the tournament.

Player Torrente broke the heal fort rule.
Disqualified from the tournament.

Player GUNAR broke the Dimension Door rule by using it twice in 1 turn.
Disqualified from the tournament.

Why such harsh repression for common gameplay violations? Isn't tech support more than enough, right? Did even one opponent of a disqualified player appeal to the judge to apply severe sanctions against their rival? At this rate of disqualifications, there will soon be no one left to play. And violations will happen often, especially with shifted guards.

Juristis

13 years ago

Auto-translated

Only mass executions will save the Motherland.

In reply to rebellious

R55Max

13 years ago

Auto-translated

rebellious

Why such harsh penalties for ordinary in-game violations?

Ordinary? We need to get rid of this stereotype. The violation by player GUNAR was revealed only after a complaint from his opponent. Naturally, once a violation is found, it cannot be ignored. The disqualification was not issued without reason. We discussed the case internally. If anyone wishes, they always have the option to appeal to a higher authority - the AC (Arbitration Committee). 2 other participants were already in the lower bracket, so for them, it's essentially the same as a disqualification. BUT, simply awarding a technical defeat does not provide the necessary emphasis on the action committed. The interpretation of violations is not specified in the forum rules; its justification is based on the personal views of the hosts and judges on the situation! Strict views, positions, and methods are not a whim – they are the choice of each organizer of any event! P.S. Furthermore, I cannot express all the desired points and satisfy the "journalistic side" because it affects the interests of the "investigation."

Dark

13 years ago

Auto-translated

or maybe we should update the grid?

In reply to R55Max

rebellious

13 years ago

Auto-translated

R55Max

Ordinary? We need to get rid of this stereotype...

You should know a thing or two about football. What match goes by without tackles, handballs, warnings, and red cards? There's no need to draw parallels. The question is, what is the proportionality between the crime and the punishment? It would be better to initially develop a scale of punishments or principles of responsibility. And then, only then, "execute."
...we need to be gentler with people, and look at questions more broadly... ©

In reply to rebellious

R55Max

13 years ago

Auto-translated

rebellious

You should understand football. What match goes by without tackles, handballs, warnings, and red cards? There's no need to draw parallels. It's simply a matter of proportionality between the offense and the punishment. It would be more appropriate to initially develop a scale of punishments or principles of accountability, and then proceed with "executions."
...we need to be gentler with people and look at questions more broadly... ©

I understand football. You've drawn an incomparable parallel. A handball in the penalty area results in a maximum of a goal (this is a punishment for the team) (80% chance that the punishment will be carried out, i.e., a goal will be scored). But the punishment for a handball is 100% (either a red or yellow card). However, different referees may award a penalty or not. Define a scale of correctness.

Develop a scale, and we'll talk about it.

Unfortunately, your wish to look at questions more broadly doesn't allow for a "broader" view of my decisions.

Communication with people in ICQ and making decisions in a tournament differ because there is a BIG DIFFERENCE, as any decision made in favor of one party is disliked by the other.

R55Max

13 years ago

Auto-translated

Chingis

Who gave you the right to threaten punishment for a violation that hasn't even been committed?

My comments were directed at those who were violating the rules. I myself am not violating them.

I played 8 games with different factions. Let the opponents say whether I violated any rules.

Please, what threats are you talking about? On the contrary, I was warning you to be careful. I don't remember in which thread, but you openly stated that you would violate certain rules, and then let them try to prove it... Maybe you've already deleted that message, but many people managed to read it. For me, that was the height of audacity, and I took note of it. No one forced you to say that...

Reading content in

Interface language

Posts from Jebus Cross - 3

Statistics

Library

Users Online 6 users 1378 guests

Today's Visitors 13