Are there no Restores left? On fast maps, the chances against Dungeon, even without Double, are close to zero.
And I didn't know about Double until the finals; we were playing on HD+, so you can't peek.
New here? I'm Roha — want a quick tour?
Are there no Restores left? On fast maps, the chances against Dungeon, even without Double, are close to zero.
To give a little boost to players who haven't been eliminated yet, a new rule is being introduced:
If players who have already been eliminated become contenders for the title of King 3 times in a row, the next eliminated contender will be guaranteed to be a new player (one who hasn't played before). This player will be chosen randomly from a pool of players who haven't participated yet.
At the beginning of each year, the elimination statistics are reset.
What are these backward maneuvers? We're changing the rules mid-tournament.:confused:
There was a "Vanka-Vstanka" tournament...
And now they decided to get rid of Amiloo this way!? :confused: What is the world coming to:(
Are you afraid that a couple of players might constantly be playing? :D
But we did warn that probability is a tricky thing.
24.02.2013 GoD(Red, Necro, Gosh, Gosh) def twaryna(Blue, Swamp, Tazar, Tazar) Jebus Cross 122
I immediately stated in the rules that minor adjustments to the regulations could be made during the tournament. I'm still refining it; I'm doing it for the people. But I'm not going to back down from randomness, so don't count on it. :rolleyes:
He has already backed down significantly... and not just with some minor adjustment. How can there be any randomness when the organizer changes the random selection? Moreover, this "adjustment" deprives the player Amiloo (who has just started playing) of the opportunity to continue participating after losing. In that case, it should be stated in the regulations:
"The organizer assigns opponents at their discretion"
And then there will be no questions, including about transparency.
In my opinion, the system is being optimized from ruthless and merciless randomness into a rather fair randomness where no one will be offended. I don't understand what Rebellious is unhappy about...
I completely don't understand what you're talking about.
What worries me more is your fierce attacks on everything. You apparently haven't learned from our recent conversation.
I would be dissatisfied if someone stepped on my toes. But here, I'm just noting the inconsistent approach to running the tournament:
- the rules are not changed or adjusted during the game. And all miscalculations and shortcomings are accepted and corrected for subsequent rounds. No one who signed up can complain, as they were informed about the regulations. But when there is an unmotivated and opaque revision of the tournament regulations, I will not pretend that nothing is happening.
And if you write my nickname in Russian, at least spell it correctly.
Added 9 minutes later
If you initially allowed randomness to rule, then you should stick to that principle.
What do the words "attacks" and "fierce" mean in this context? And who or what are "they"? Where is the specifics? And criticism should be taken more calmly and with gratitude. It is criticism that helps to improve.