numOne
Auto-translated
I would be dissatisfied if someone stepped on my toes. But here, I'm just noting the inconsistent approach to running the tournament:
- the rules are not changed or adjusted during the game. And all miscalculations and shortcomings are accepted and corrected for subsequent rounds. No one who signed up can complain, as they were informed about the regulations. But when there is an unmotivated and opaque revision of the tournament regulations, I will not pretend that nothing is happening.
And if you write my nickname in Russian, at least spell it correctly.
Added 9 minutes later
If you initially allowed randomness to rule, then you should stick to that principle.
What do the words "attacks" and "fierce" mean in this context? And who or what are "they"? Where is the specifics? And criticism should be taken more calmly and with gratitude. It is criticism that helps to improve.
I perfectly understand criticism and always listen to it if it is constructive. But you are just constantly grumbling. Sometimes you don't like randomness, and sometimes you do. Reading your posts on this forum, I am a little puzzled: why are you always so dissatisfied? If you don't like something, create your own, and channel your energy into something positive. :)
The main regulations were drawn up by me just before the start of the tournament, and nothing has changed or will change in them until at least the end of the year. Now, there is just a small improvement to the player selection system, which is logical, since the tournament is new and all the nuances cannot be taken into account immediately.
Пусть мой враг будет силен и страшен. Если я поборю его, то не буду чувствовать стыда.