"King of the Hill"

In my opinion, the system is being optimized from ruthless and merciless randomness into a rather fair randomness where no one will be offended. I don't understand what Rebellious is unhappy about...

I would be unhappy if someone stepped on my toes. But here, I'm just noting the unsystematic approach to running the tournament:
- the rules are not changed or adjusted during the game. And all miscalculations and shortcomings are acknowledged and corrected for subsequent tournaments. No one who signed up can be offended in principle, as they are informed about the regulations. But when there is an unmotivated and opaque revision of the tournament component of the regulations, I will not pretend that nothing is happening.
And if you write my nickname in the Russian transliteration, then write it without errors.

Added after 9 minutes

I completely don't understand what you're talking about.

If you initially allowed randomness to rule, then you should stick to that principle.

What worries me more is your fierce attacks on everything. You apparently haven't learned from our recent conversation.

What do the words "attacks" and "fierce" mean in this context? And who or what is "everything"? Where is the specifics? And criticism should be taken more calmly and with gratitude. It is criticism that helps to improve.