Skip to content

Posts from Mafia: general discussions.

5.0 (2 ratings)
In reply to Kaito
User Avatar
13 years ago
Auto-translated
Kaito

Orton is to blame. He could have screwed up again with translations and angered the mafia.
Screwing up again with this city? After I revealed my activity to the mafia? They would kill me at night. Game over for the city.
In reply to ortonnn
User Avatar
13 years ago
Auto-translated
ortonnn
Are you suggesting we mess up with this town again? After I revealed myself as a Mafia member? They would kill me at night. It would be game over for the town.
But as it is, you died during the day.
User Avatar
13 years ago
Auto-translated
Ort, ND – it would have been done. If the city still had any defenses, they would have noticed the anomaly: Kaito opened his mouth – he was killed, Toh – he was killed, Ort – he was killed. And so on.
User Avatar
13 years ago
Auto-translated
Zubr, it seems you’ve forgotten that the mafia kills at night.
User Avatar
13 years ago
Auto-translated
Zubr, it seems you've forgotten that the Mafia kills at night.
What does that have to do with anything? Revealing information is a violation of the rules. It would be one thing if it were a slip of the tongue, but in this case, it was a deliberate action to help one of the sides. That's unfair play. Do you enjoy winning that way? Personally, I don't. I hope others don't either.
User Avatar
13 years ago
Auto-translated
Is demanding the cancellation of an execution as a condition for victory normal?
User Avatar
13 years ago
Auto-translated
Is demanding the cancellation of an execution as a condition for victory normal?
No one has won yet, and you don't know which side I'm on. So let's put that aside until the game is over.
User Avatar
13 years ago
Auto-translated
Kaito is right, guys. As long as the GM doesn't implement extremely harsh punitive measures – up to and including automatically losing a city upon its first breach – the rules will continue to be violated. And they weren't created to be violated.
If, however, you punish the entire city with a modkill, it will at least weed out some of the "benefactors" who think: "Let them modkill me, but I'll help the team!" You know who I'm talking about.
I'm speaking freely because I'm not following the game and not participating in it.
User Avatar
13 years ago
Auto-translated
I hope that such instances are rare exceptions for you. Even a hint of playing a specific role leads to a modkill for us. For example, when a player simply allows themselves to say, "I would say, but for obvious reasons, I can't." As a result, the number of such instances has decreased.
Such cases only occur with specific players; it seems that their skill level or their own lack of understanding plays a role, as they attribute responsibility to the town.
If the reveal is in the style of Dag, then in that case, a modkill should be given to that player, and there should be a 50% chance of the town's night actions succeeding the following night, because after such reveals, the day continues, and the town may very well execute a member of the mafia. If the reveal is in the style of Orton, then it's time to start issuing a loss for such behavior. Perhaps this will deter people from acting in this way, and other players will not want to see such players in games and will be against their participation. And certainly, no one will thank them.
And in general, +1 to Sivas's post. Everything he wrote is correct.
User Avatar
13 years ago
Auto-translated
On the one hand, everything is correct; such investigations provide the community with a lot of good and useful information that is difficult to obtain through fair play, and compensating penalties should be imposed for this information. On the other hand, players are not responsible for one bad person, and it is not very fair if they suffer from his actions. They may have played honestly, thought, and tried, and then someone like that appears and ruins everything for everyone.
User Avatar
13 years ago
Auto-translated
If the reveal is done in Doug's style, then in that case, the player should receive a modkill and a 50% chance for town Night Defense to activate the following night, because after such reveals, the day continues and the Mafia might be executed. If the reveal is done in Orton's style, then it's time to start issuing defeats for such behavior. Perhaps this will discourage people from acting this way, and other players won't want to see such players in games and will be against them being included. And certainly, no one will thank them.
Kokoko, the Mafia is upset.
In reply to Arandor
User Avatar
13 years ago
Auto-translated
Arandor
and 50% chance for town skills to activate the following night
I like this one. I would just change it to 100%. Let them have the whole night without skills activating.
User Avatar
13 years ago
Auto-translated
Why ruin the whole game? I don't think the GM wanted to cut everything short and give you an easy win because of Orton, which you would, of course, be very happy about.
User Avatar
13 years ago
Auto-translated
Hey, I'm not talking about this specific game (I don't play it, I don't read about it), but about the fact that this point needs to be included in future versions. Of course, no one will change the rules in the middle of a game, as it would be unfair to the players.
User Avatar
13 years ago
Auto-translated
If this is an Orton-style autopsy, then they should start issuing defeats for such things.
Do you think this one is too?

Statistics

Welcome our newest member: recijeb