Posts from Forum Auto-translated

For those who advocate for strict adherence to the letter of the law, here is some additional information: violation system, section 4.22.

Regarding the scoring for this item, you can confidently file an appeal. However, in this case, the literal, written-down divine immunity of the moderators will decide everything, rather than common sense and moral standards.

So what do you suggest we do?

Also for your information, for all those advocating strict adherence to the letter of the law: the violation system, clause 4.22.

You are a moderator, so you should be the one to make a decision. But in my opinion, turning a blind eye to such player behavior is not acceptable. There was a precedent with Влк — based on it, moderators act primarily based on personal sympathy or dislike toward a person. That is not right.
I didn't know this. The very content of the clause and the number of points for it suggest tyranny. It's understandable that everyone is too lazy to complain to someone higher up about every little thing moderators do. So it turns out we have to put up with any abuse from moderators that might pop into their heads. There is no freedom of speech. You can give me violation points for this post, but understand and forgive HellLighT, since he is the tournament organizer...

The best option would be for Ikhtiandr to resolve his issue with HellLighT in a private message, rather than putting on a show here and lecturing everyone about what true morality is, etc.

And what do my words about morality have to do with it?)) I wasn't teaching anyone, telling anyone what to do, or insulting anyone. It seems you simply disagree with my point of view, which is why you started supporting the unreasonable HellLighT and, in a way, approved of everything he said against me... What a great moderator! Keep it up!))

R55Max, LOL, how long do you think it would take to fire all the shots on morale? This is at least disrespectful to the opponent (if I were in Sevan's place, I would have expressed myself more rudely). And he even posted the victory after such nonsense, what a guy!))

According to the rules, there's nothing to criticize, everything is fine, but from the point of view of basic human ethics, I don't think he acted very well.

Personally, my ideas about knightly honor and dignity would never allow me to post such a victory. And of course, I understand that explaining this is useless. How do you explain to a thief that stealing is wrong? It's impossible, because the laws of honor are not subject to logic. Some people simply realize them, while others don't.

As for the topic at hand, you could have resolved this issue like a man – by talking to HellLight in a private message and figuring out who is right. But, according to him, you start cursing him in private, while on the forum you try to act all high and mighty. I don't understand this.

If you want, you can dig up more about morality.

I suggest using common sense right now. The best option is for Ikhtiandr to resolve his issue with Hellight in a private message, rather than putting on a public show here and lecturing everyone else about what true morality is, etc.

He publicly insulted someone, waited for the posts to be deleted, and then ended the conversation – excellent work, Hellight! Of course, one can disagree with Ichthy's opinion about the morality of mages, but that's no reason to behave like a pig.