

New here? I'm Roha — want a quick tour?

I thought this topic had run its course, but no, the fun continues.
To determine guilt or innocence, confirmation of just one violation is sufficient. That's why I chose the option that is 100% true. All other options can be debated at length (which is already happening over 25 pages), discussing whether this person is good or not, etc. But for me, one fact of a rule violation is enough.
Why did you vote that Vigo was not guilty? (or did you make a mistake and don't know that you chose the wrong option)
eosnow 23.11.2012 10:05
How are things going in your favorite tournament?
Vigo 23.11.2012 10:05
Not good, I was accused and disqualified.
.......
leosnow 23.11.2012 10:08
What post on the forum?
Vigo 23.11.2012 10:09
I don't know, in my favorites.
l
It's strange that Vigo doesn't even know which tournament he was accused of cheating in and disqualified from.
Actually, it happened not in "Favorites," but in "One for All," the only tournament he played in. He could at least remember the name of the tournament.
l
It's strange, Vigo doesn't even know in which tournament he was accused and disqualified.
Actually, it happened not in "Favorites," but in "One for All," the only tournament he played. At least he could remember the name of the tournament.
Good name for the tournament: "One for All"... Maybe Vityok and Vitalik took it literally?! ;)
He already left a comment saying that he voted for the wrong option. I moved this comment to the first post in the poll.
In my opinion, this clearly shows how careless Vigo is, and nothing more.
A good tournament name: "One for all"... Maybe Vityok and Vitalik took it literally?! ;)
In any case, everyone should understand that each player must play on their own and minimize the involvement of third parties.
There will be no transfers. We'll break through ourselves!
Reserves: Stinger, Preds, Vitalik, and a few more guys )))
Vigo (21:36:45 25/10/2012)
What are we doing about the rematch? Tell me when you can, we can start right now, but let's password-protect the saves, it'll be safer!
Vigo (21:37:25 25/10/2012)
Or haven't you calmed down yet?
......
335665133-1@qip.ru (21:44:51 25/10/2012)
What rematch?
335665133-1@qip.ru (21:44:55 25/10/2012)
Two matches. The score is 1-1.
Vigo (21:45:17 25/10/2012)
Well, yeah, I guess we should play a rematch, right?
335665133-1@qip.ru (21:45:29 25/10/2012)
Two matches.
335665133-1@qip.ru (21:45:33 25/10/2012)
I won the first Anarchy game.
335665133-1@qip.ru (21:45:36 25/10/2012)
This is the second one.
335665133-1@qip.ru (21:45:38 25/10/2012)
What's wrong?
335665133-1@qip.ru (21:46:17 25/10/2012)
Go write your report, I'll confirm it, and that will be all.
Vigo (21:46:18 25/10/2012)
Yeah, that's right, but shouldn't we play until someone wins two games?
335665133-1@qip.ru (21:46:23 25/10/2012)
No.
Vigo (21:46:44 25/10/2012)
Damn, I thought we had to play a rematch.
+1000:D, next time the organizers need to be more responsible when choosing a name for the tournament:D :D :D
A thousand arguments, but no answers. Should we close the thread / should Vigo be banned?
Yes, playing simultaneously on 20 boards (or rather, computers) is like grandmaster Ostap Bender.:D
