Dima Surmay
Auto-translated
To determine guilt or innocence, confirmation of just one violation is sufficient. That's why I chose the option that is 100% true. All other options can be debated at length (which is already happening over 25 pages), discussing whether this person is good or not, etc. But for me, one fact of a rule violation is enough.
Why did you then vote that Vigo is not guilty??? (or did you make a mistake and don't know that you chose the wrong option)