Posts from philosophy

Many people may have the same opinions at certain moments.

Why? If it benefits people to come to a common understanding, they will do so. But it is clear that each person is an individual – without a doubt.

There are mandatory agreements and there are free agreements. In a free agreement, each party believes that the deal is beneficial to them; otherwise, free agreements would hardly be concluded.

Firstly, an agreement (strictly legally speaking) cannot be compulsory.

There are agreements that are seemingly voluntary but are actually coercive. This is a disguised coercive agreement where one party sets conditions that cannot be refused.

I wonder how history textbooks are written in Germany?

I don't know about the textbooks... but you're right about the camps - Auschwitz is the same as Освенцим, just earlier... but I was misinformed by third parties... by the way, Poles still call it Auschwitz...

A city? Or a camp? It was "Oswiecim" – a camp founded near the city. I'm not entirely sure about the details...

I wasn't defending Nicholas; I'm just saying that he was simply a military man, incapable of leading a country, especially during such a difficult time. The war was initiated by Minister Plehve, who pressured the Tsar and convinced him to start it. This happened often and still happens; after all, that's what ministers are for (in the sense of advising, but advising correctly). As for the Resurrection, it's not certain that he knew who was coming to him; he was simply informed that a crowd was moving towards the palace. I'm not saying he was a good person; he was incompetent, but not more than that.