philosophy

I wasn't defending Nicholas; I'm just saying that he was simply a military man, incapable of leading a country, especially during such a difficult time. The war was initiated by Minister Plehve, who pressured the Tsar and convinced him to start it. This happened often and still happens; after all, that's what ministers are for (in the sense of advising, but advising correctly). As for the Resurrection, it's not certain that he knew who was coming to him; he was simply informed that a crowd was moving towards the palace. I'm not saying he was a good person; he was incompetent, but not more than that.

That's an interesting point!
So, it turns out that all the decisions were made by his less intellectually challenged advisors, and they also misinformed him about the Resurrection... but he still made the decision to order the shooting?!
In general, two questions arise: firstly, why, if he was such a worthless and pathetic person, doesn't he just stay quietly on the sidelines, and instead manages to make the situation even worse (because his vacillations with Rasputin and the lawlessness that the latter perpetrated are entirely Nicholas's responsibility; they truly found each other, two damaged individuals)? And secondly, why does Russia even need this creature with the proud title of emperor?
In my opinion, the Bolsheviks answered these questions correctly...
P.S. By the way, why are you only talking about the Resurrection? What about Khodynka? That was no "misunderstanding"; it was simply criminal negligence.