Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
This tournament doesn't need any special introduction; everyone already knows everything. I'm continuing the tradition of hosting blitz tournaments, where you'll get a lot of excitement, see that the generator favors the strongest, and when a mage arrives at the tavern, you'll be overjoyed. Well, you get the idea – M-200% in all its glory.
This is precisely the unique aspect and charm of these tournaments; they have already been played six times in this format. What's with all the voting? Why change the announced rules? It's always unpleasant when you sign up for one tournament at the beginning of registration, and by the time the games start, you discover a bunch of changes and you're already signed up for completely different conditions.
Good afternoon. I'm writing on behalf of the viewers. I have a big request: 1. Stream! 2. Save the streams. This is very important because streams with dynamic gameplay are in demand even a year or five years after the game. 3. Add titles to the streams. A template is especially important (and if there's a balance, please also indicate the map size and difficulty level).
I found the grand final #3 between Zydar and num0ne on my hard drive; if you're interested, I can upload it somewhere. P.S. The tournament format is not subject to change :smile27:. Except maybe for the external market (it's like a stigma of the tournament that has been following me for all six tournaments; I'll see how active the neighboring thread is and draw conclusions).
Good afternoon. I'm writing on behalf of the viewers. I have a big request: 1. Stream! 2. Save the streams. This is very important because streams with dynamic gameplay are in demand even a year or five years after the game. 3. Add descriptions to the streams. A template is especially important (and in the case of balance, please also indicate the map size and difficulty level).
I would gladly stream how *not* to play :rolleyes:, and most importantly, for the sake of communication ;), BUT 1. I don't have a license. 2. My computer can't handle streaming; it won't be able to cope, and I don't have the resources or time to figure it out. 3. I'm really not good enough for people to watch; I can only stream to one fan (unfortunately, I don't have one yet) via Skype screen sharing :D.
"Бороться, бороться, пока не покинет надежда, что может быть в жизни прекрасней подобной игры." В.Каверин "Два капитана".
7. If a battle ends in a draw, the attacking player must retreat. For example, a spectral dragon flees from a hundred golems, and they cannot reach it. If the War Shackles artifact is equipped, players must attack each other every round until someone wins.
Ideally, if a player with golems attacks, they should lose, and not the player with the dragon. IMHO, this is not correct... and since the game is played at 200%, a ban on the Refugee Camp should be introduced. Otherwise, the first player will get an Archmage, and the second player will get a Dragon.
7. If the battle ends in a draw, the attacking player must retreat. For example, a ghost dragon runs away from a hundred golems, and they cannot reach it. If the Shackles of War are equipped, then the players must attack each other every round until someone wins. Ideally, if the player with the golems attacked, he should lose, not the one with the Dragon should fight. IMHO this is not correct... and since the game is played on 200%, a ban on the refugee camp should be introduced.. otherwise the first one will get the arch and GG the second.
What you wrote about retreat is exactly what is written in the rules; fighting only applies if the Shackles are equipped. As for the camp, that is too much; what is the probability that this arch will appear? what is the probability that there will be a camp at the starting respawn, plus the guard could be very nasty.
What you wrote about retreating is exactly what’s stated in the rules; fighting only occurs if the shackles are worn. And regarding the camp – that’s an exaggeration. What’s the probability that this archer will appear? What’s the probability that a camp will spawn on the starting resource, and that it might have very unpleasant guards?
Shackles are a plus for the attacker, but if they can’t use them... why should the defender attack in a battle? And regarding the camp, there’s always a chance... and it appears very often, someone of level 7.
and since the game is 200% more enjoyable, a ban on the refugee camp should be implemented... otherwise, the first player will get an Arch and GG, and the second player will be left behind.
Absolutely not!
Пусть мой враг будет силен и страшен. Если я поборю его, то не буду чувствовать стыда.
On the contrary. As far as I know, he hasn't influenced the outcome of any of the previous 5 tournaments, but he can add intrigue, and that's a plus. By the way, I'm not sure if he even exists in these templates. :)
Пусть мой враг будет силен и страшен. Если я поборю его, то не буду чувствовать стыда.
What you wrote about retreating is exactly as stated in the rules: fighting is only possible if the shackles are worn.
Miscellaneous If a stalemate situation occurs in battle, the attacking player must retreat. For example: the attacker has 100 gnomes remaining during the battle, while the defending hero has 1 fly. And the 100 gnomes cannot catch the fly. In this case, the attacker with 100 gnomes must retreat (or pay a ransom). If someone is wearing "war shackles," you need to load the last save, repeat all moves exactly as they were made before this battle, disband the troops that were killed during this battle. Then, the player(s) wearing the shackles must remove them, the attacker must attack, and then retreat/pay a ransom. I think you've confused something in the rules.
Quite the opposite. As far as I know, he hasn't influenced the outcome of any of the previous 5 tournaments, but he can add intrigue, and that's a plus. By the way, I'm not sure if he's even on these templates. :)
I definitely saw him on the balance a couple of times. But nothing good ever came of it.
Pit for LM
