Auto-translated
Something about Zenit was said here:D
In reality, the line between ethics, humanity, fairness, and other synonymous concepts in such situations is very blurred and intertwined. There can't be any 100% truth about this, as each person has their own understanding, views, and principles, and ultimately, their mood at the time of such situations.
That's why distinctions are created for such cases, so as not to lump everything together. A friendly match is a friendly match (where a match with 7 substitutions, where both auto-play and everything else is normal).
Let's take Tournaments. What is a tournament? It's a competition, and in any competition, the result is the most important thing. In any competition, it is necessary to determine a winner **WITHIN THE RULES OF THE TOURNAMENT.** Any victory within these rules should be considered fair. No one is to blame for mistakes, misclicks, and other cases, except for the player themselves. Why blame the opponent for your own mistakes, for the randomness, for morality, for giving up the generator? Everyone who registers for a tournament understands that many matches can end one-sided, but the opponent is not to blame for this. And a game reset should be given if it is provided for in the tournament rules.
You need to not only be able to play, but also to lose if the winner has not violated the rules of the game.