Connection ErrorBad RequestSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Honestly, why can't I express my personal opinion on the FORUM, even if it includes some strong language where it's simply necessary to fully convey my thought?! It's like a kindergarten, I swear.
Nothing personal, but there are rules for the Portal, so try to follow them...
Okay, if there was profanity in my message, you could have simply edited it instead of deleting the entire message, as there were no other violations of the rules.
Added 6 minutes later
In the event that a user's message contains inappropriate or offensive language, the message is edited by a moderator, and the sentence or paragraph containing the violation is placed within the tag
Moderated: INAPPROPRIATE LANGUAGE in the message
...
.
Added 2 minutes later
By deleting my message without explanation, you yourself violated the rules. Please restore it, and in the future, try not to violate the rules.
Okay, if my message contained profanity, you could have simply edited it instead of deleting the entire message, as there were no other violations.
According to the rules, I am required to delete a message containing profanity, rudeness, or insults, which is what I did. I also could have given you penalty points, but I didn't.
The message I deleted fell under the above. Read the Portal rules, and then join the discussion.
Main portal rules: Clause 3. The use of vulgar and offensive language in usernames, avatars, messages, and signatures is prohibited on HeroesWorld. Clause 4. Any direct or indirect insults to users, third parties, or organizations are prohibited on HeroesWorld.
Clause 6 of the Moderator Rules:
"Messages containing violations described in clauses 4.9 - 4.13 of the current violation system must be deleted with appropriate violation markings."
4.9. Violation System:
"4.9. For any direct or indirect insults to users, third parties, or organizations, 25 violation points."
С истиной где-то рядом...
Лето 2010.
R55Max
Auto-translated
To moderators: Please don't ban me, I really want to have a meaningful conversation, but please delete Ihtiandr's messages; just let him express his thoughts in a meaningful way or at least with some connection to what was said before.
To ariputra:
Tim, believe me, I don't want to offend you personally right now, and I hope you won't say anything unpleasant about me either, but rather try to understand why you have such contradictory opinions? I've known you on the forum for a while, but I don't understand what your attitude towards life is? Are you a Christian or a follower of other religious beliefs, an atheist, or a supporter of identifying the "white (Aryan)" race? I, for example, am a supporter of Christianity; it's not worth discussing opinions on this topic on the forum if your worldview differs from Christian beliefs or your views are not similar, but I would be interested in knowing your point of view.
You write:
Not long ago, on Ren TV, German Sterligov told a story about a Chechen family. The eldest of 8 children started using drugs. When his father found out, he shot him with an automatic weapon in front of his wife, his own children, other children, relatives, and acquaintances, saying that if anyone else starts using drugs, he will do the same. All the fathers and elders of other families supported him.
At first glance, it may seem cruel, but no one else in his family will become a drug addict. In fact, he protected not only his own children but also other children.
Did he do the right thing? I think he did the right thing in this case.
Why is it right? This is one way to show that this is not the right thing to do, but it is not the only way, and it is no less bloodthirsty than the act of the criminal. He would be held accountable for his actions after death, during his afterlife. There, the person will answer for everything.
If one person kills another, then in this life or in one of the following lives, according to the law of karma, he will also be killed and will receive exactly as much suffering as he caused to others before.
Therefore, it is impossible to kill, even as punishment. Punishment is a method of guiding the wrongdoer to the right path without violating God's commandments. But since we (people) are not perfect, it is extremely difficult to understand and agree with this, given that emotions and feelings dominate us.
The law of karma is the law of cause and effect (the present is a consequence of the past and the cause of the future), the law of justice, the law of the rake (step on a rake, get hit in the forehead), you reap what you sow (either in the form of gifts or in the form of kicks).
That's right. But no one can be the top part of the rake that hits you in the forehead. If, for example, one person commits a terrible act (violating commandments, not saying that it is permissible to violate commandments in relation to the one who committed the violation). And Christ forgave everyone, even those who killed his body, and loved them and raised those who accepted this into his kingdom. This is difficult to understand, but it is so.
Father is higher than God for his son, husband is higher than God for his wife, teacher is higher than God for his student.
The last two words are blasphemy; there is no one higher than him. God is love, and if someone loves, then God is in him (not to be confused with passion), and at the end of earthly life, you will stand before him, and then it will be too late to wonder whether life on earth or there is more important. The body dies, but not the soul. Please read this website to understand my questions to you. I am not imposing them on you, but it would be inappropriate to answer without knowing what I am basing my arguments on: http://www.truechristianity.info/dont_you_believe_in_god.php Then, perhaps, you will understand me, and I would be happy to read what you have to offer.
To ihtiandr: I managed to read your message before it was deleted. I want to reveal a small secret to you: urine is a product of the breakdown of the liquid you drink and the food you eat; breast milk in a mother's breast is a product of the withdrawal of blood and lymph from the body that remains inside the body; semen is like milk in a woman, but it's more complicated, read the literature, and then laugh.
МУДРЫЙ - не обязательно старый, ОПЫТНЫЙ - не обязательно мудрый... обладатель и того и другого всегда должен помнить слова НАПОЛЕОНА БОНАПАРТА: Война состоит из непредусмотренных событий; В каждом большом деле всегда приходится какую-то часть оставить на долю :smile33: СЛУЧАЯ...
Ihtiandr
Auto-translated
Clause 3. The use of profanity and offensive language in usernames, avatars, messages, and signatures is prohibited on HeroesWorld.
If my message did contain profanity, which I did not intend to use, according to the rules, you should not have deleted my message:
In the event that a user's message contains profanity or offensive language, the message is edited by a moderator, and the sentence or paragraph containing this violation is placed in the tag
Moderated: PROFANITY in the message
...
.
Clause 4. Any direct or indirect insults to users, third parties, or organizations are prohibited on HeroesWorld.
My message did not contain any direct or indirect insults to users. I did not personally insult anyone, nor did I intend to.
In light of this, I request that my message be restored.
...My message did not contain any direct or indirect insults towards users. I did not personally insult anyone, nor did I intend to.
In light of this, I request that my message be restored.
You believe there were no insults, I believe there were (the insults were directed towards third parties, specifically the fairer sex), so what shall we do?
"Insults towards third parties" is an independent reason for removing a message (according to the Rules).
the more often a man has sex, the dumber he becomes, and a woman becomes smarter
A man doesn't necessarily become dumber; it's just that the mechanics of the physical body and the subtle body (mind) are such that their parameters – memory, logic, thinking – deteriorate, but in return, the person becomes incredibly energetic for some time.
For example, any international grandmaster playing at a high level has this experience.
But a woman doesn't become smarter from sex, at least my wife doesn't :D
Ihtiandr
Auto-translated
"insulting third parties" - is an independent reason for deleting a message (according to the Rules).
The term "third parties" implies specific individuals, not half of humanity. Specifically, I did not insult any individuals. Due to the absence of a violation of this rule on my part, it follows that by deleting my message, you violated the rules. I request that you correct this inaccuracy and restore my message.
The term "third parties" implies specific individuals, not half of humanity. Specifically, I did not insult anyone. Since there was no violation of this rule on my part, it turns out that by deleting my message, you violated the rules. I ask you to correct this inaccuracy and restore my message.
In general, let's do this... I will restore your message No. 2503, and I ask the Moderators or Coordinator to judge us....
С истиной где-то рядом...
Лето 2010.
Lider1
Auto-translated
Are you all completely out of your minds?
Is spring really having such an effect?
Сейчас балуюсь этим https://vcmi.eu/download/ За то что нейтралы не бегают за единичкой, для меня это уже стоит того
Happy Life
Auto-translated
Thank you for restoring the post, it’s very funny.
A man who seriously thinks he's smarter than a woman is already a complete loser.
Ariputra, sorry, but I think you're talking nonsense.
By the way, if a man throws 10 sticks, does he lose 4 liters? Maybe we should prescribe milk as compensation for the hardship?
Земля нуля. Все в ней нулево и кукольно.
Ihtiandr
Auto-translated
A man who seriously thinks he is smarter than a woman is already a complete loser.
Then I don't know how to describe a man who thinks he is dumber than a woman.
A man who seriously thinks he is smarter than a woman is already a complete loser.
Actually, it all depends on what kind of man and what kind of woman. There are women who make many men seem stupid, and there are men who it's hard to be any dumber than :D
But in general, what is meant by the word "intelligence"? If it's about the fact that men have more achievements in science, that they play chess better, etc., then men are definitely smarter. Although, it's probably not just about intelligence... I don't even know. Has anyone ever thought about what an indicator of intelligence is?