Posts from Forum

Some believe that one should try to think critically about what they hear before accepting it as truth.

Some believe that one should try to think a bit about what they've heard before accepting it as truth.

As for me, after writing this, I thought about it. But before you criticize someone, study the subject of your criticism, refute it, prove otherwise, and then draw a conclusion.

I thought about it after I wrote it,

the more often a man has sex, the dumber he becomes, and a woman becomes smarter.

And I didn't even remember about prostitutes. I wasn't thinking clearly.

every person has 4 flaws:
- we inevitably make mistakes;
- we live in an illusion;
- we are prone to deception;
- our feelings are imperfect.

Actually, the first one is enough.

He didn't even remember the whores. Poor thinking.

Actually, the first one is enough.

Appreciated the sarcasm.
Of course, you're right, there's no need to think about whores. Stop resorting to personal attacks; discuss the topic without relating it to the specific person addressing you by their nickname.
And in general, if you disagree with something, write a message consisting of text with information contradicting what you disagree with.
If you just want to chat, then welcome!

only someone who wishes you well, someone who is motivated by concern, has the right to point out your flaws – for example, parents have the right not only to scold and punish, but even to kill.

but pointing out each other's flaws here isn't a very good idea, so I apologize if I unintentionally offended anyone.

Only someone who wishes you well, someone who is motivated by concern, has the right to point out your flaws. For example, parents have the right not only to scold and beat, but even to kill.

Can you read and understand what I wrote? It's very scary to read words about someone having the right to kill someone.

So, that's why I was wondering why women's careers and academic performance improve after intimacy; it turns out it works like this: they become smarter! :)

And what if we consider minorities? It turns out that "energy" transfers from one man to another and back => we get 100% energy efficiency, and there it is, the perpetual motion machine that everyone has been searching for!

Another suggestion: what if we change ejaculation to just spitting, and then continue with the following points... with the words: "prove that this isn't true!" and links to sources with such "ideas."

Can you read and understand what I wrote?

There's nothing to understand; it's like Taras Bulba: "I gave you life, and I will take it away!" :D

What if we consider minorities? Then it turns out that the "energy" of one man passes to another and back => we get 100% energy efficiency, here is the perpetual motion machine that everyone has been looking for!

:D :D :D :D :D :D
I fell under the table! :D
This deserves a Nobel Prize!!

Could you explain what you wrote in a way that can be understood? It's very disturbing to read words about someone having the right to kill someone else.

Not too long ago on Rain TV, German Sterligov told a story about a Chechen family. The eldest of 8 children started using drugs. When the father found out, he shot him with an automatic rifle in front of his wife, his own and other people's children, other relatives, and acquaintances, saying that if anyone else started using drugs, he would do the same. All the fathers and elders of other families supported him.

At first glance, it may seem cruel, but none of his other children will ever become drug addicts. In fact, by doing this, he protected not only his own children but also others'.

Did he do the right thing? I believe he did, in this case.

______
If one person kills another, then either in this life or in one of the next lives, in accordance with the law of karma, he too will be killed and will suffer exactly as much as he caused others to suffer.

Karma — literally translated from Sanskrit as "activity, action."

Karma is: actions in accordance with the laws of God and nature — the consequence is "gifts."
Vikarma is: actions based on one's own whim, without regard for any laws — the consequence is "kicks."
Akarma is: actions that have no consequences — neither good nor bad.

The law of karma — the law of cause and effect (the present is the result of the past and the cause of the future), the law of justice, the law of the rake (step on a rake, get hit in the forehead), you reap what you sow (either in the form of gifts or kicks).

The law of karma states that there are those to be punished and those who carry out the punishment. Those who carry out the punishment, by punishing someone who is due to receive their punishment at the appointed time, automatically become subject to punishment themselves if they are not authorized to carry out that punishment.

A father to his son, a husband to his wife, a teacher to his student — are above God.
Individuals in the position of father and mother have the full right to punish their children, because they love them, wish them well, and punish them for their own good.

Plus, the living entity itself — the soul — is immortal, never born and never dies. It cannot be destroyed by any kind of weapon. It cannot be killed.

Death is the process when the soul (i.e., the living entity itself) permanently leaves the gross physical body in a subtle material body, and in accordance with its desires and karmic status (the sum of pious and impious deeds, mindset, state of consciousness), is born anew, in one body or another, in one place or another, to one set of parents or another, and continues to strive for various sense pleasures, desires, goals, plans, etc.
And the material body was never alive; it merely exhibits signs of life as long as the soul is present within it.

In sleep, the soul in the subtle body also leaves the gross body, because it cannot be inactive, while the physical body needs rest. All dreams are reality on the subtle plane. Every person, whenever they sleep, sees dreams. Some are remembered, but most dreams are simply forgotten. Then the soul returns to the physical body and continues to act within it.

____________________
That eldest son of his, in the next life, most likely will not remember his past life, but he will fear drugs and everything associated with them more than fire. Moreover, his activity will most likely be connected with the fight against drugs.
This is called samskara — a very vivid, strong sensation or impression brought from a past life.

Nowadays, there are many children who remember their past lives. 3-4-year-old children describe everything in such detail, pointing out facts they could not possibly have known, naming the names of their past relatives, sometimes telling where they buried something. There are research groups studying the "phenomenon" of reincarnation, funded by the state, who travel to the locations and verify all the information obtained.

The Wheel of Samsara — the endless cycle of births and deaths. A living entity is born, grows, gets sick, sometimes enjoys, ages, and dies, and is born again to once again try to become happy.

But what if we think about minorities? Then it turns out the "energy" of one man transfers to another and back => we get 100% energy efficiency, there's the perpetual motion machine everyone has been looking for!

How could such an idea even come into your head :D, just don't try experimenting, Galina Sergeevna was joking, they won't give you anything :D, only after they catch you

Another suggestion, what if we replace ejaculation with just spitting, and then go point by point... with the words: "prove that this isn't true!" and links to sources with such "ideas".

How can you prove anything to a person who has no authorities, no point of reference, who is an argumentative person by nature — you just have to give up on that endeavor.

The inconsistency, the absurdity of "Your" idea, which you used only to show that even if it (the idea) is not refuted and has sources (links), that still doesn't mean it is true, is obvious.

And you are right, if an idea has sources and you couldn't refute it, then by itself that still doesn't mean the idea is correct, but it also doesn't mean it's incorrect. The case with absurd ideas is not considered here. In the case of "Your" idea, its absurdity stems not only from my disagreement with it. And the truth of any idea does not follow simply because I think so.

But there are normal ideas, without quotation marks, which are simply not obvious to me or to you — and just the fact that they don't match my personal, own beliefs — does that prove their inconsistency, does it prove it's nonsense? "It's not true because it's not true, because I disagree with it, and that's that." Well, that's just a convenient position.

If anyone takes such a position, then neither I nor you will be able to prove even the most obvious things to them! For example, that 2+2=4, the existence of Australia, that there is a sun, etc. And also, if the ideas and beliefs of a person who takes such a position are obviously absurd, for example, 2+2=8, you should walk on chickens and eat with your feet, the main function of the eye is to crack nuts, etc., then neither I nor you will be able to convince them otherwise. And what then can be said about things that have been tested for millennia, which are a fact that they are true and lead to happiness rather than madness and suffering, but are simply not obvious — it is absolutely impossible to prove them to a person who takes such a position. Therefore, if you disagree with something, I have no objection.

_______________________
The soul in both the male and female body, and in the animal and the tree — is the same. What differs is the degree of conditioning, the degree of contamination of consciousness.

For example, in a living entity that has received the body of a tree, consciousness is in a semi-conscious state, practically unmanifested. When it is cut down, or someone urinates on it, it can neither resist nor run away. It cannot say: "get your fingers off, okay." It doesn't like it, but it can't do anything about it — such is its degree of freedom.

In humans, consciousness is much more developed, so the degree of freedom is many times greater. But if a person misuses their freedom, abuses it, they will be punished in accordance with the law of karma (if a son does not obey his father, what does the father do?):

If a woman does not fulfill her duty as a caring mother and a faithful, obedient wife, fights with her husband for the right to lead, cheats on him, leads a promiscuous lifestyle, tries to play the role of a man in society — then in the next life that soul will be born in a male body, but with unfulfilled female desires (since she did not fulfill her duty) — what such "men" are called, I think everyone knows (gay).

Also, if a man does not fulfill his duty as a father, husband, son, does not take care of his wife and children, parents, leads a depraved lifestyle — then in the next life he (such a soul) will be born in a woman's body, but with unfulfilled male desires — what such women are called, I think everyone also knows (lesbians).

Ancient Eastern wisdom: "It is better to perform your own duty poorly than to perform another's duty well."

:D:D:D:D:D:D
I fell under the table! :D
This is a Nobel Prize!!

laughter through tears

Missed all the fun) But I'll still have to explain myself.

One sexual act for a man means a loss of up to 400 grams of blood... it takes from 1 to 2 weeks to fully recover (restore blood and other substances).

And when he goes to pee, he also loses half a liter of blood. If we had to recover for a week after each time, we would all have died long ago)).

I heard on TV that scientists have proven (if we don't go into professional terms, the essence is as follows): the more often a man has sex, the dumber he becomes, and a woman becomes smarter.

I'm just saying what I heard. By the way, this show was on the sports channel - Russia 2. It was either a show called Science 2.0, or a segment in it, hosted by Anna Kosterova.

Don't believe those frigid feminists who want to put men down in perverse ways. Comparing the intelligence of a woman and a man is pointless. Women's minds are geared towards fulfilling two goals: to give birth to a child and to make a man her slave for life. Everything else is irrelevant to them. How many great historical female figures can you remember?

All of this is actually very logical and correct if you turn to the word of God, as Christ said to people: live and multiply (or something like that). According to the Lord, every sexual act should lead to the conception of a child, and not to the satisfaction of one's own lust, which, on the contrary, must be fought.

That is, if a righteous man has 3 children, did he have sex 3 times in his life?)) The Lord said "Be fruitful and multiply," that is, have sex as much as you want. When you contradict your desires, you contradict the will of the Lord, from which you cannot escape. Because the Lord is in each of us, and we are in Him. And His ways are inscrutable. If most people are constantly having sex and having fun, then that is what the Lord wants, and there is nothing wrong with it.

A woman must first grow a person within herself, so she needs the most, including giving the child the intelligence taken from the father.

That's right, because a woman doesn't have her own intelligence)).

A woman does not become smarter, she is initially smarter than a man, this is the structure of the female coarse (physical) and subtle (mental) body, her mind is 6 times stronger, but her reason is 9 times weaker than that of a man.

Another slander from frigid feminists)) They have no brains!

In general, all these modern unspoken rules of the mystery of sex are amusing. Everyone is having sex, but they are embarrassed to talk about it, as if it were just a simple realization of their instincts. And if a child suddenly finds out that he was the result of a penis being inserted into a vagina, then that is a horror, his psyche will be damaged forever, and he will spend the rest of his life in a mental hospital. In my opinion, when a child is frightened by all this nonsense throughout his childhood and told that he should never masturbate, and then he grows up and learns that in reality everyone is just having sex, then that is when his psyche can really be damaged and he will start to take revenge on this world)). So all these high-minded conversations about sex are just empty lies, it is better to simply enjoy life and have sex with everyone you want, rather than tormenting yourself with this topic)

Well, they deleted all my thoughts, which I wrote with some effort, and without any explanation... Where is freedom of speech? Shame on the moderators!

Well, they deleted all my thoughts, which I wrote with some effort, and without any explanation... Where is freedom of speech? Shame on the moderators!

First: there was profanity;

Second: unacceptable insults towards the beautiful half of humanity.

I considered this sufficient grounds for deletion.

First of all: there was swearing.

I don't remember using profanity. If I did, I could have just edited it out.

Secondly: unacceptable insults directed at the fairer sex.

What does "unacceptable" mean? Are we dealing with a society of frigid feminists here?)) In general, the previous posts were an insult to the NOT-so-fair sex, and I just tried to bring people back to their senses. At least consider this nonsense:

the more often a man has sex, the dumber he becomes, and a woman becomes smarter

....

Either your freedom of speech adheres to the rules of the game (excluding unnecessary insults and rudeness), or it won't see the light of day.

The choice is yours.

And in general, why can’t I express my personal opinion on the TRIBUNAL, even if it includes profanity in a place where it simply cannot be avoided in order to fully express my thought?! It’s like a kindergarten, honestly.