- Comparison of creatures from Heroes 5 with creatures in Heroes 3. — Polls

3.0 (1 rating)

Single choice Public votes

Poll results will be visible after you vote or when the poll closes.

First
Previous
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Next
Last

In reply to Ganymed

Alex Ghost

19 years ago

Auto-translated

Ganymed;52835

From the perspective of our country, this might be true. However, I was referring to a global trend. After all, WOG, for example, is popular not only in our country but also worldwide. But, I've expressed my opinion...:D

But here, it's a Russian-speaking community! Not Americans or Canadians, whom I frankly don't care about (sorry if I offended anyone)!!!:rolleyes:

In reply to Alex Ghost

Ganymed

19 years ago

Auto-translated

Alex Ghost;52843

(sorry if I offended anyone)!!!:rolleyes:

No problem, as an American would say.

GvozD

19 years ago

Auto-translated

So much blood has been spilled here in this pointless argument. I voted for 3, but the poll is misleading. How can you compare paintings with sculptures? And in general, there are always complaints, from everyone (those who don't have them don't even know what they're talking about). IMHO, the truth is drowned out in such polls. It would be better to create a thread with suggestions (at least in the form of drawings) for the appearance (since it's so unsatisfactory).
P.S.

Ganymed;53265

Don't mention it, as an American would say:)

An American wouldn't say that:).

Ganymed

19 years ago

Auto-translated

Yes, an American would phrase it differently, but I provided a literary equivalent that is accepted in classical English.

Алисия

19 years ago

Auto-translated

Yes, I'm a die-hard conservative. To me, the heroes from the third installment seem warm and familiar, genuine, alive, and most importantly, they capture the spirit of the game. As an analogy, I can compare them to old films on simple film stock; they look much more lively, realistic, and pleasing than new, computerized ones... Everything has its drawbacks. Both hyper-realistic graphics and digital cameras, and even the creatures from the 5th version, have their downsides.

Pablo N Ochoa

19 years ago

Auto-translated

There are as many opinions as there are people... that's why I like forums :-)
But when it comes to comparison, the creatures in the 5th game look almost like they did in the 3rd (if we're talking about their appearance and not the graphics), but the 3rd game feels much more familiar...

Svercha

19 years ago

Auto-translated

In the 5th game, the creatures are more fairytale-like...more drawn...like in a cartoon, while in the 3rd game they are more realistic...like from a photograph. IMHO.

Чебурашка

19 years ago

Auto-translated

I'll share my opinion: in the 3rd installment, good design ideas were ruined by the low technical level at the time. When you look at the pikemen, you just feel sorry for them. The 5th installment of Heroes is essentially the same as the 3rd, but made in the style of modern games. For some reason, the castles in the 5th installment don't surprise me. The units are predictable. There's a ranged unit, a melee unit, and a mage. And about the graphics - overall, the graphics are decent. But again, it strongly resembles a modern RPG.

Arandor

19 years ago

Auto-translated

In the third game, everything is much better, more realistic, and beautifully drawn, with a few exceptions (pikeman, hobbit – too big) =)
In the fifth game, everything is cartoonish =((( but the game is interesting, with many new features, skills, and more units of the same type (elf – swordsman, archer, druid), etc.

P.S. I'm all for realism! =

In reply to Arandor

Alex_R

19 years ago

Auto-translated

Of course, a liquid crystal monitor is better than an electron beam monitor (of the same class)... the same goes for Heroes 5 being better than Heroes 3, but there are exceptions:
For example, I would never get rid of my "ViewSonic PT775,"
because I bought it for 500 dollars... and now, a similar type of TFT monitor costs significantly less, although in many ways it is superior.... so Heroes 3 is one of those exceptions where everything was much better than expected, including the units....
P.S. By the way, the rendering of castles has become worse, although it is also cooler!

In reply to Arandor

Amko

19 years ago

Auto-translated

The units are great in both games, but in the fifth installment, they seem to be better, probably due to the larger scale.

Arandor;103257

Everything in the 5th game is cartoonish =(((

Really? :) Give me five more examples, besides the skeleton and the skeleton archer. :)

P.S. I'm all for realism! =)

The main thing is that realism in fantasy doesn't turn into absurdity. :D

Arandor

19 years ago

Auto-translated

Guys, everyone! Except for the Angel and Griffin, the chubby demon hero, the human hero, the imp, the Cerberus, the zombie... maybe someone else.
I really don't like the Warcraft-like graphics. <_< bleh.

As for the volume and size, I give the fifth game a big plus for that; huge titans are awesome!

In reply to Arandor

Amko

19 years ago

Auto-translated

Arandor;103269

Guys! All of them! Except for the angel and griffin, the chubby demon hero, the human hero, the imp, the cerberus, the zombie... maybe someone else.
I generally don't like the Warcraft-like graphics. <_< Boo.

Lancers and paladins with Incas are cool. :cool: The demon isn't chubby; it's just wearing very thick armor. ;) The imps are fine, and the dogs only have problems with their tails. :)

Arandor

19 years ago

Auto-translated

their proportions are off, short legs and arms. Huge armor, it's hard to imagine how anyone could walk in that, the foot is the size of a head... just ridiculous.

they did a good job with the elves, both light and dark, and with the Academy faction.

P.S. a peasant with a rope instead of a belt is just absurd... they need something to hold their belly in =)
I also don't like the shields of the swordsmen and cavalry (the outer side).