Posts from Mafia: general discussions.

Let's create a topic with a poll and decide if such topics are needed, since there are already two precedents. I think that's democratic.

For example, these topics didn't bother me at all. Why were they deleted?

What's it to you? You and Slonysh don't even play (not counting the Zubrovskaya Mafia) and just come in to stir things up. What difference does it make to you? This issue should definitely be decided not by you, but by all players. If you didn't like the topic, you could have created a poll about it. The majority would have voted, and then the issue would have been resolved.

Let's create a topic with a poll and decide if such topics are needed, since there are already two precedents. I think that's democratic.

I first deleted one. Then I put it back and deleted the second one. So, there's no need for that here.

What's it to you? You and Slonysh don't even play (not counting the Zubrovskaya Mafia) and you just come in to stir things up. What difference does it make to you? This issue should definitely be decided not by you, but by all the players. If you didn't like the topic, you could have created a poll about it. The majority would have voted, and then the issue would have been resolved.

Where did you see a clone? Did I ask you to post settings in my topic and discuss them? I posted a setting for review, so that people could read it and vote based on what they read. If I had just written that I would create a game based on this world, fewer people would have signed up.

So, the topic was created specifically to discuss various game variations. Here you can post your drafts of game themes, role descriptions, and so on.

Again, the purpose of creating it was a POLL, that's the only thing that made the topic not a clone. Did you not have time to see if you had enough players? It was there for an hour, two, a day? No, more. Today, you finally reduced the topic's content to discussing the details of the setting. After that, the topic became your personal clone of the Workshop. Questions?

I offered to revert it, but you're dictating your own terms.

And what's the point of reverting it now? If you restore all the messages and delete the unnecessary ones (from the Tox topic), then it's okay.

This system hasn't disappeared. It just temporarily created two new topics, and that's it.

In short, it's clear that these topics didn't actually bother anyone, and it all boils down to personal issues. Sad but true.

Let's create a topic with a poll and decide whether such topics are needed, since there are already 2 precedents. I think that's democratic.

I would be "for" it if I saw concrete arguments in favor of creating such topics. The phrase "This topic won't bother me" doesn't work, because it's neutrality. Whether it's present or absent, it doesn't matter.

So, you’ll have to spend more time on the mafia game! Many times more!

Dictating the conditions – is that encouraging people to maintain order? O_O Why did you even take on the responsibilities then?))) To show everyone how cool you are?

And at the beginning, the argument was, "I need a poll there!" "That’s exactly why I created the thread!". Something isn’t working out for you.

The system didn’t include the creation of such threads.

Message from the Workshop
So, the thread is created specifically for discussing various game variations. Here, you can post your drafts of game themes, role descriptions, and so on.

It's possible, but not required.

Because the moderator broke the rules.

And where is it stated that one can post their own drafts in a separate personal thread?

If you didn't like the situation with your topic, you could have created a poll: "KIND PEOPLE, HELP! TOPICS ARE DISAPPEARING IN BROAD DAYLIGHT, WHAT SHOULD I DO?".

You can, but you don't have to.

You just admitted that you created a clone. And yes, I don't read the workshop, and when I looked at your topic, I didn't read it either.

I figured out a simpler way to do it, because not everyone reads the forum and not everyone signs up to participate. Let's assume I took a shortcut and decided not to spend too much time on it.

Is the system written down somewhere? Are they all supposed to follow it?

It's possible, but not required.

Okay, let's imagine the following scenario. Let's say there are 6-7 GMs who are planning to run games for 2-3 months. These are just hypothetical numbers. They all create threads related to their games, including polls. And it turns out that 3 of them have roughly the same issues with the game mechanics. We all try to help each other here, but it's unlikely that anyone will want to write the same thing three times. At best, they'll copy and paste. And if someone writes to Pete, "Hey, look, Kolya has the same issue, I explained everything in his thread, I'm too lazy to repeat myself, you can find it yourself," then poor Pete will have to dig through Kolya's thread and think, "Why did I even create my own thread if I have to look for the answer in Kolya's?" In this case, both sides will be inconvenienced. But if all of this were in one thread, it would be easy to highlight it with a quote and explain everything clearly in one post.