Posts from Academy of Sciences of Heroesland Auto-translated

Yeah, right. Who among us is more dishonorable? You, who called me all sorts of names, or me, who offered you a fair duel? I haven't received a clear answer yet.

Since the intelligentsia at that time dictated fashion to all other social classes.

And the men didn't even know! By the way, this proverb should be understood literally in this case.

You, who called me what you called me, or me, who offered you a fair duel?

Threatening to beat me up with the help of your clan members – is that what you call a fair duel? Oh, how much new I learn about this world!

Which clanmates are you talking about? I don't personally know anyone there. However, if this is an excuse for you to back out of a fair duel, you can continue to play the offended innocent and hide behind your "clanmates."

What clans are you talking about? I don't personally know anyone there. However, if this is an excuse for you to back out of a fair duel, you can continue to play the offended innocent and hide behind your "clans."

De Sadik, don't lie. And yes, have you decided to read the article about the Bretons I recently mentioned? Judging by your behavior, it certainly seems that way.

Officer, don't you want to talk to me? Or do you consider the topic closed?

If you've forgotten something, you can't really regret it. Especially since we were talking about knowledge and effort.

Secondly, Morny, secondly. I'm always happy to talk to you, but those two questions were somewhat inappropriate. Although in the new formulation, I understand you. So, I want to say that the values I would have in that case are not so important to me, and now I cherish all of this.
Siever, it may sound strange, but a Russian man was also a bearer of a certain culture. Dostoevsky convincingly proves this in his 'Diary of a Writer', which also includes the story 'The Peasant Marey' on this topic, which can be read separately.

A fleeting, minor statement came to mind: "There are things worse than death." "Like what?" You said mental degradation. On a theoretical level, I completely understand your point of view, but I ask you to provide a real-life example, a real situation. Because armchair theorizing can go as far as you want in any matter, but it will remain just that, and it will only be good for posting on VKontakte along with other profound statements like "a fire of justice burns in my soul" or "what doesn't kill you makes you stronger." By the way, I just said this as a comparison, and without any sarcasm, because recently in Mafia discussions, I discovered that everyone expects this from me. People cited sclerosis and a vegetative state as examples, but both of these cases are not entirely valid.
So, tell me, what real-life situation could lead you to such a state of mental degradation and loss of any mental aspects that you mentioned? I'm interested in what could actually be "worse than death and worse than anything" for a rational person? As a real example, and not an abstract "mind locked in an empty box, not receiving information and devouring itself."

Is there anything in Rasputin's biography that Boney M sings about?

Yes.I reviewed the textbook and a couple of reference books. It only states that he "had unlimited influence on the Tsarina."

whether it be a knight, a samurai, or a gentleman

I have no idea about samurai, but the intelligentsia of the nineteenth century (especially the early part) perfectly understood what honor was. This is evidenced by the rather casual attitude of writers of that time towards its manifestations, as if it were something self-evident (as in Pushkin: Tatyana refuses Onegin without hesitation, it is written as if another answer is theoretically impossible).
Since the intelligentsia at that time dictated fashion to all other strata of the population, they had to, willingly or unwillingly, conform to that level in some way. And now, the fashion is dictated by the rest, let's call them that.
Quoting writers and poets of the Romantic era does not confirm the absence of depravity at that time. It seems that your favorite writer is Dostoevsky? He is closer to the truth, although one should not judge a society of any period solely by fiction.

reviewed the textbook and a couple of reference books. It only states that he "had an unlimited influence on the queen."

quoting Boni-m or Taurisus

RA RA RASPUTIN RUSSIAN QUEEN IS LOVE MACHINE

Morni, the point wasn't about a real-life situation, but a fictional one: extending life through mental degradation. I was specifically against that.
Veg, we learned about Rasputin in history class. And in general, it's a very well-known fact. If it's not mentioned in your textbooks, it's only out of politeness.
And is Pushkin a romanticist? But in any case, Dostoevsky is a realist, so I have no reason not to trust such a source.

Extending life through cyborgization. I wouldn't call that degradation.

But is Pushkin a romanticist? However, Fyodor Mikhailovich is definitely a realist, so I have no reason not to trust such a source.

Believe, but don't imagine the picture of that era solely based on fiction, even works by naturalists, because the world presented in a book is not captured directly from reality but passes through the prism of human perception before being recorded.

And what are the achievements of the Scientific Academy? I hope you haven't created another sect?)

Letter - "C"

422 pseudoscientific posts!