Posts from Creation by fans of the game.

Dear forum members! Please evaluate my creative talent by reading my review of 3 heroes: http://mykorob.ucoz.ru/publ/igry/obzor_heroes_of_might_and_magic_iii_the_restoration_of_erathia/5-1-0-53

Baron, your talent has already been sufficiently appreciated, why don't you just play instead of writing all this nonsense?

1. My gaming computer is broken. 2. Since I've already started, I'll keep working on it until the preview for version 6 is ready. 3. We need to increase the traffic to that website. 4. Does this mean it's bad?

Having used the link to the review of the third part, I also watched the review of the second, because the link you provided to it doesn't work. First, I'll go over the Second Part.
The first thing that catches the eye is that the description of the campaigns doesn't mention the almost unique ability to switch sides at a certain point. Yes, it mentions plot branches, but it's usually like this: you go with the dwarves or you go with the elves, but in Heroes 2, fighting for Roland, you can switch to Archibald's side and vice versa. This is cool, and I haven't seen anything like it in the series since.
Second, the music. "Opera performances have appeared, but who needs them?" Considering that the music in Heroes 2 is considered almost genius and one of the best soundtracks for games. Maybe you didn't like it, but the review should be objective.
Third, I don't remember exactly whether it appeared in the first or second part, but it seems to be in the second. So, the review doesn't mention the ability to collect puzzle maps and dig.
Overall, it's not bad, but the same complaints apply: it's too short and rushed.

Now, the Third Part.
I'll start with a complaint: "the city can bring us up to 10,000 per day." Which city? With the dwarves' treasury and already a lot of money in the treasury? In fact, the income from the Capitol is 4,000.
It is mentioned that there are obelisks in this part, but it is said in a rushed manner. "Obelisks show the location of the legendary Grail." It creates the impression that if you find one obelisk, you'll immediately find the Grail, with no mention that you need to collect the map.
"Artifact sets – by collecting the necessary artifacts, you will receive a bonus for the set, in addition to their bonuses." Not just artifact sets, but powerful artifacts that are assembled from other artifacts. You don't just have a green set, like in Diablo; you have the Lich King's Cloak, the Alliance of Angels, an artifact, not a set, not just a set.
The general comment is the same. Good gameplay, graphics, sound, etc. Here is your review. Write it in more detail.

Separately, I'll note that you mentioned the graphics in both parts (2 and 3) very briefly – it's an understatement to say that you mentioned it briefly. "The images of the characters finally look as they should for warriors, all of them." First, warriors. Second, everyone was impressed with the creatures, and the cities, and the overall art style in both the second and third parts. The picture was simply wonderful in both parts. And your statement is equivalent to the phrase "there are graphics, soldiers are drawn." What is this minimalism? No, you suffer from minimalism, but in the third part, you wrote about the music, even if briefly, in a way that shows it's good. But here – it's a blank space.

10000?! I'm surprised myself how I could have written that. I must have been lost in thought...

city + grail

+ dwarven treasure

Gentlemen, forum members! I’ve finally written a review of 4 heroes! I’m writing from my phone, so I can’t post a link, but I think you already know where to go.

Please rate my creative talent by reading my review of 6 heroes! Here is the link: http://mykorob.ucoz.ru/publ/igry/obzor_quot_might_and_magic_heroes_vi_quot/5-1-0-75

Heroes of Might and Magic 3 (and its Russian counterpart, Heroes of Might and Magic 3.5 (WoG)), due to the failures of games unworthy of being called Heroes of Might and Magic 4 and Heroes of Might and Magic 5, currently remains the best of the turn-based strategy games with heroic-fantasy content. However, Heroes of Might and Magic 3 (hereinafter referred to as HoMM3) also has its drawbacks and potential for improvement. I propose to create a list of what needs to be removed from HoMM3 and a list of what needs to be added to HoMM3, so that when Heroes of Might and Magic 6 (hereinafter referred to as HoMM6) begins to be developed by a competent team (unlike the previous ones, which were fixated on 3D graphics and other unnecessary things in global turn-based strategy games), it could take into account the wishes of future buyers of HoMM6. REMOVE: "Chains," "Unpleasant" abilities and skills that unnecessarily occupy hero slots ("Eagle Eye," "Navigation" on maps without water, ...), ... ADD: A workshop where you can create a new artifact from several artifacts (the number depends on their cost and the hero's magical power) to speed up the acquisition of "assembled" artifacts.

Heroes of Might and Magic 3 (and its domestic clone, Heroes of Might and Magic 3.5 (WoG)), due to the failures of games that are not worthy of being called Heroes of Might and Magic 4...

Hey, there's no need to bash the fourth installment! If you don't like it, don't play it! It's just interesting online when you're facing a real person, not a dumb AI. It's beautifully made, and the idea is good, but not fully realized. Ah, if only the source code were freely available...

I myself started with "part two" and gradually moved on to "part three." I consider these parts to be great and the most interesting, but "part four" also has a place in my heart. After that, something went wrong. Either it didn't work out at all, or it worked out crookedly. In general, it didn't work out. Maybe the other parts aren't any worse, but I played them little and they didn't grab me.

Um, the topic is actually about something completely different. P.S. The fourth part is the best. And that's final.

You made me laugh! ))) First Heroes: No dragon upgrade. Second Heroes: Two dragon upgrades. Third Heroes: One dragon upgrade. Fourth Heroes: No dragon upgrade. Get it? The fourth game degraded to the level of the first Heroes! Up to the third game, the number of units increased. And then the terrible fourth game comes out, in which the number of units suddenly decreases, and the heroes lose their individuality! The quest scenarios are good. I completed them all with pleasure and interest. But after completing these quests, just to experience their scenarios, there is simply nothing to do there.

And in the fifth game, there are two tiers not only for dragons but also for non-dragons. Checkmate!

Yes, I understand. The person simply doesn't like Heroes 4 because it features tigers.

"The fifth installment" is just nonsense. The last decent Heroes game was the third one. I don't care about tigers. The fourth Heroes game is just awful and a step backward compared not only to the third but also to the second.