Posts from Heroes 6 - Discussion

(C)Ilat is a handsome creature. And, by the way, he doesn't belong to any faction.

It reminded me of Thunderbirds.

Waiting for Firefox users.

I recently sent someone here; the beta code (intended for pre-order customers) didn't work for him. Actually, it seems he didn't post anything.

I did direct someone with that nickname here; I might even still have the Skype log.

I wonder if they will show Sar-Elama?

A mage is a mage, what is there to show?

Dead Mage.

A dead mage.

So what? I spawn hundreds of them in battles against the Academy. And if you're talking about a Lich, there are plenty of them in the Necropolis.

Silat, Askh, Arkat – they all pass. The rest are simply not dragons. Shalassa is basically an ichthyosaur. I especially dislike Silanna. After all, she embodies the earth, its life, and its fertility. But here, she's depicted as an ugly draconic creature.

Yes, Shalassa would have been better if she resembled that aquatic creature from the artwork, like a water elemental from Heroes of Might and Magic V. By the way, who said that Dragons have to look like dragons (anticipating complaints about this)?

Because it's mainstream. And that's why they will definitely add elves, because they are also mainstream.

You're hilarious. Elves are canonical and cute. ^^

Regarding the dragons: Arcat is demonic, but cool. Everything has already been said about Shalassa. Urgash is some kind of mutant. I would rather choose Urgash over Arcat if I didn't know about the Black Dragons' perversion regarding demons. Ashah is quite good. Silanna could have been made better, but she's not bad either (at least it's clear that she's an earth dragon). Silat's wings are poorly made, but he's a cute dragon otherwise. Elrath is an overgrown griffin with a long neck. Even his wings are feathered. Malassa is normal.

You're the one who's wrong. Elves are canonical and cute.^^

You're the one who's wrong if you think so.))))

That's why elves will definitely be added, because they are also popular.

And what's wrong with their popularity? The developers aren't oppressing orcs, or anyone else, and moreover, they didn't even include elves in the "starter pack."

And what's wrong with their popularity? The developers aren't oppressing Orcs, or anyone else, in fact, they didn't even include the Elves in the "starter pack."

Isn't anyone saying that there's anything wrong with this? The question was simply asked, why do dragons look the way they do. They look that way because that's the "standard." Now, the concept of "Fantasy" is associated with "elves, dragons, magic." If these three components are missing, then it's not fantasy... a cliché, pop culture, call it what you want, but it's a fact.)
Many people say:

Elves are canonical. And cute^^

Many people will get Elves. Elves will be 100% in the release.

I'm just tired of seeing them. Elves are being shoved everywhere, even into post-apocalyptic settings...

"Silat" is not a localization of Ylath; it is a localization of Sylath. Ylath translates to "Ilat," and Sylath translates to "Silat." Sylath is simply a different dialectical spelling of Ylath.