Posts from philosophy

That's hilarious!!!: and you're probably a "potato," meaning you have a weak sense of national identity (no offense, it's just a common belief).

That's hilarious!!!: and you're probably a "potato," meaning your sense of patriotism is diminished (no offense, it's just a common belief)???

Should I put a disapproval again? If you can't write the nickname correctly, just copy it. What kind of connection to the people is this... are we living with outdated prejudices? Mine isn't diminished. It was killed by what's happening here. For me, my homeland is where my family and friends are. For now - it's here.

Are you going to give me a disapproval again? If you can't write the nickname correctly, just copy it. What kind of connection to the people is this... are we living with outdated prejudices? Mine isn't registered. It was killed by what's happening here. For me, my homeland is where my family and friends are. For now - it's here.

So, you're still from where I thought... you know, family and friends can be in Zimbabwe, so that's where your homeland will be, right?

so you're actually from where I thought... you know, if your family and friends are in Zimbabwe, does that mean that's your homeland too?????

if both family and friends are there, then it's possible. but what would they do there? However, homeland doesn't necessarily mean permanent residence. Let the homeland be there, and permanent residence somewhere else.

If you have both family and friends, then it's possible. The question is, what would they do there? But homeland doesn't necessarily mean permanent residence. Let the homeland be there, and permanent residence somewhere else.

It's clear that we have a fundamentally different understanding of what "homeland" means... in my opinion, you're a cosmopolitan... I think we should close the topic of "homeland" because you hurt my feelings with your words, and quite a bit...

Look at how they treated Vietnam War veterans... how they threw crippled, legless men into the trash and said, "You're no longer needed, you lost the war."

Which they started themselves. But the veterans here have nothing to be blamed for; they were just following orders. And because of Bush, the whole world will soon hate America! He's already annoyed everyone except Western European countries! Pearl, goodbye.:) The remaining year and a half will be more than enough for "George" to turn all of Asia and Eastern Europe against him. And that includes Russia, China, and Ukraine...;):D And Belarus too! My heart tells me that war is just around the corner! And then – hold on, West! Throughout history, only Siberia has managed to defeat Russia, but, as you can see, Siberia is with us! And the current Russia (I mean the REAL Russia, not counting officials, politicians, and liberals) cannot be defeated PHYSICALLY! Do you think Dulles came up with this plan for no reason? He was the first to realize that Russia cannot be defeated from the outside and can only be destroyed from within! This plan is now being implemented throughout Russia, and that's why there is a feeling of "old age," which may actually happen if nothing is done. Alex, I strongly disagree with you!:) Russia has never aged! It was simply tied up and forcibly put in a wheelchair!!! And if this continues, it will be shoved into a nursing home!!!!! Remember my words, there will be a war! And I don't envy the Americans; no "Tomahawks" will save them! It will be a battle of HEROES and cowboys. Who do you think is stronger – a knight who carries God or a milkmaid?:)

Knight – from Old Slavic "God" and "to steal (carry)," meaning – one who carries God.

Cowboy – from English Cowboy – a cowherd, milkmaid, shepherd.

Dear, everything is relative. There are no absolutely democratic countries. But the level of democracy here and there is incomparable. But I'm not interested in arguing – you lack argumentation. There are just some banal phrases that have long become tiresome.



I respect your opinion. It is not devoid of common sense.

Pearl, why do you think that you will be loved in other countries?

Regarding aging: it's not my idea, it's a law of nature. You can't be eternally young. Dying young, however, is perfectly acceptable. But living for several centuries and working incredibly hard for 35-40 years – that takes its toll. And there's nothing wrong with that – it's reality. BUT! After an old man passes, his children remain, who remember their father, love him, and are ready to provide for him in his old age. And such children exist! And we are ready to support our father, if only we had the strength!
A revolution isn't needed for this. We simply need to organize our own party, win the elections, and stop thinking about our own wallets. I believe that honest people still exist. And we will be able to revive the greatness of Eurasia! And what it will be called is not so important: Russia, Siberia, or even Gadyukino!
Regarding life in the West, regarding their democracy – read A. Zinoviev. He himself lived there for many years, having been exiled from the country. And he describes it all very well. The West's prosperity is built on the exploitation of the resources of the entire planet, which means that as soon as the flow of resources stops, the West will collapse. The problem is that this may happen after the resources are simply exhausted. And then all of humanity will collapse. :(

And then we will win!

Then we will win!

or else... of course, we will win...

Alex, I appreciate your faith in the new party that will bring order, but believe me, as a Muscovite, the one who wins the elections now isn't the one who wants what's best for the people, and not even the one with the most money. The one who wins is the one who is most beneficial to the other politicians. In the case of honest candidates, either their votes are rigged, or they have an "unfortunate accident." And when World War III begins, I can even describe it: first, the average Russian man will get tired of all this nonsense and will overthrow the president and a tsar will rule again. The tsar will start to bring order, namely, by imposing censorship on television, advertising, the internet, and so on, he will cancel all the Western reforms that were "supposedly for the good of Russia," he will restore the old education system, raise culture, and so on. As a result, Russia's former republics, and maybe even new ones, will begin to join it, seeing what Russia has achieved during this time. The West, of course, will not like this, and they will start to make the same demands on the new empire that they once made on the newly formed Soviet Union. They will threaten, issue ultimatums, because all this undermines their "Dulles plan." And that's when the real fight will begin. And then – we will definitely win!!! :)

Yes, a king would be useful. We need to pretend to be just like everyone else, and then start bringing order!

And how will an honest tsar end up on the throne? Only through revolution and civil war. And that won't lead to a strengthening of the country. But coming to power through democratic means is realistic. We just need everyone to come out and demand complete transparency in the elections. Shooting and deceiving the people who have gathered in the square is suicide. Even our idiotic government won't go for that. And then – we can put a tsar on the throne (but not a Romanov, better Shaimiev or Tuleev. Or Lukashenko). But only a federal empire, with broad autonomy, and with Soviets.

And so, a royal Soviet republic is formed. CSR.

Better this way: Eurasian Soviet Federated Empire - ESFE.