Мафия 23. The Rockland tavern — Mafia

Ple-Sen

12/14/2010 2:22 PM UTC

Auto-translated

But then Neyra also points to Roland, and plus, with her Dungeon from the 5th game, it fits the reference to Archibald. Koteiko fits Catherine Ironfist (she's from the human faction, after all!), and so on, just open any profile and you can find a connection to one of the Ironfists.

This is exactly the argument that was used against Regist, namely, the "faction."

I agree about the tea, but candies don't suit me at all.

Elephants love candy.

In reply to Ple-Sen

Слоныш

12/14/2010 2:49 PM UTC

Auto-translated

Ple-Sen

That's exactly the argument used against the Registry, specifically, the "faction."

No, not a faction, but a userbar. With a specific emblem.

Ple-Sen

Elephants love candy.

But don't people? :smile52:

Mourinho

12/14/2010 3:18 PM UTC

Auto-translated

Execute Slonysh

Because of the tea, the ladle, the strange hat, and the smell.

Added 4 minutes later
Those who don't vote or put "NNK" will be checked in the future, and I will vote against you.
Day is the only time we can kill the mafia.

Happy Girl

12/14/2010 3:29 PM UTC

Auto-translated

Mourinho, you are such a tough guy! :p
And you never stopped by for tea, why is that? :smile08:

Вот что плохо в питье водки с утра - трудно будет провести день разнообразно

In reply to Mourinho

Слоныш

12/14/2010 3:32 PM UTC

Auto-translated

Mourinho

Because of the tea, the ladle, the funny hat, and the smell.

Oh, and here's the support group that suddenly appeared out of nowhere:cool:

I won't argue for the hundredth time about the rest of the nonsense, but what does the ladle have to do with it?

Ple-Sen

12/14/2010 3:37 PM UTC

Auto-translated

But what does the ladle have to do with it?

You use it to scoop out the apple liqueur.

In reply to Arandor

Слоныш

12/14/2010 3:46 PM UTC

Auto-translated

Arandor

Unless Ple-Sen, with his mention of the forbidden fruit (apple) in his signature... But that's rather vague, and in any case, I don't see a second piece of evidence.

It's more likely too obvious than vague.
So, it wasn't vague after all? That is, it wasn't far-fetched?

Well, I still lean towards the apple. No one else has it. The only thing that bothered me was the lack of a second piece of evidence, but I was wrong – I somehow decided that there had to be a second one.

And I was also unpleasantly surprised by Ple-Sen's desire to frame me.

Moreover, he tried to frame me using evidence from previous nights. That is, he deliberately diverts attention from the murder that occurred, and instead, we start going around in circles about the two previous ones, even though after "The Last Word of the Dead," all doubts about Reg disappeared.

And finally, the ubiquitous Mourinho again so sharply and clearly supports the attempt to frame me, but without evidence, which made my last doubts disappear.

Execute Ple-Sen based on the evidence of the apple. And note that I am not voting against Mourinho, although his role became clear to me yesterday – because I will always vote only on the basis of evidence. I wish the same for everyone else.

Mourinho

12/14/2010 3:51 PM UTC

Auto-translated

Happy, it's better not to drink tea with me. :D
Slonysh the cook, this is a weapon of mass destruction.

Arandor

12/14/2010 3:58 PM UTC

Auto-translated

So, it's not vague after all? Meaning, it's not far-fetched?

That's too obvious to be a clue. What ears are we talking about here? You don't even need to go to Wikipedia to connect an apple with Adam. That's probably why there aren't many votes, so you shouldn't worry and vote back, because it's a bit suspicious when people start voting back in response.

Be strong. Believe

Гур

12/14/2010 3:59 PM UTC

Auto-translated

NNV.

With the decision,
Gur

"Пришел, увидел и пропил..."

Хай Гурий Слесарь

In reply to Arandor

Слоныш

12/14/2010 4:13 PM UTC

Auto-translated

Arandor

This is too obvious a clue. What ears are we talking about here? You don't even need to look it up on Wikipedia to connect the apple to Adam. That's why there are no votes, so you shouldn't worry and vote in retaliation, because it's suspicious when people start voting in response.

I'm not nervous.
I see that they are trying to pin past murders on me, even though it seems like we are all interested in solving the recent murder. Let's keep rehashing my hat for the hundredth time and meditate on a cup of tea, but why look at the apple clue? No, no, forget about it!

And Mourinho, as always, is giving it away with his solidarity. :D

Again, I'm voting based on the clue, not in retaliation. Although, before the attempt to frame me, I didn't particularly suspect Ple-Sen. But now, when they start disputing obvious past clues retroactively, doesn't that tell you anything, Ar? Reg's guilt was obvious to everyone, and none of the mafia risked speaking up to defend him, arguing against the obvious – but today, suddenly! The chef with the hat suddenly became a problem for someone.

Yes, a single clue is not enough to 100% identify the killer. But there is also the logic of actions (not psychology, I emphasize, but logic!), which shows that two people are not interested in solving the new murder, but only in framing me for old ones.

Ple-Sen

12/14/2010 4:16 PM UTC

Auto-translated

not interested in revealing a new murder

One clue is not enough to solve the case, at least in most mafia games, it wasn't.

Arandor

12/14/2010 4:22 PM UTC

Auto-translated

Slohnish, you're right, but: 1. Almost everyone agrees that the execution of Registr was strange (read today's posts), and doubts about his guilt remain, even if they are small. 2. Why would Plesen return to the game and immediately start making accusations about an old murder if he's the Mafia? I don't know about you, but it seems completely illogical to me. It would have been easier for him to just sit quietly and do nothing. Think about it yourselves, and I'm going to go play. I have things to do.

Be strong. Believe

In reply to Mourinho

Слоныш

12/14/2010 4:25 PM UTC

Auto-translated

Mourinho

Those who don't vote or cast a "no vote" will be checked in the future, and I will vote against you.

This is definitely a Mafia move. To announce in advance that you will vote against those who have no evidence!
Like a "punishment for inaction"!

It's a shame that not everyone here is foolish enough to believe in your righteous anger...which will lead you to vote against the innocents. :smile10: