Слоныш
Auto-translated
This is too obvious a clue. What ears are we talking about here? You don't even need to look it up on Wikipedia to connect the apple to Adam. That's why there are no votes, so you shouldn't worry and vote in retaliation, because it's suspicious when people start voting in response.
I see that they are trying to pin past murders on me, even though it seems like we are all interested in solving the recent murder. Let's keep rehashing my hat for the hundredth time and meditate on a cup of tea, but why look at the apple clue? No, no, forget about it!
And Mourinho, as always, is giving it away with his solidarity. :D
Again, I'm voting based on the clue, not in retaliation. Although, before the attempt to frame me, I didn't particularly suspect Ple-Sen. But now, when they start disputing obvious past clues retroactively, doesn't that tell you anything, Ar? Reg's guilt was obvious to everyone, and none of the mafia risked speaking up to defend him, arguing against the obvious – but today, suddenly! The chef with the hat suddenly became a problem for someone.
Yes, a single clue is not enough to 100% identify the killer. But there is also the logic of actions (not psychology, I emphasize, but logic!), which shows that two people are not interested in solving the new murder, but only in framing me for old ones.
