Posts from Poll regarding changes to the AK regulations.

Now, the question is – are you comparing me and putting me in the same category as CHEATERS??? I really wanted to be rude, but out of respect for you, Pavel, I will remain silent. Please don’t make such comparisons anymore; my nerves aren’t made of steel.

Vitalik is a cheater. Everyone understands that.

You're wrong, Valentin, very wrong!!!

He proved his level in at least 2 tournaments!!

If a person admits their weakness in a mistake, then no one has the right to blame him for the opposite!!!

Keep butting your head against the sky, no one is listening to you)))

Wlk777, no one is putting you in the same category as cheaters, but imagine this situation: someone who voted for your unban is given the "Cheater Mark of Shame" (ЧМЧ), and then after a long time, there is a poll to remove it or not. Would you vote to remove the mark and give a second chance, or would you vote to keep it?

I don't think I'm wrong. I've looked at many save files and listened to many opinions. He definitely cheated. NO ONE dared to vote against that.

You will continue to live without your own opinion, judging by the fact that you listen to someone.

a person who has sinned)))

There is no point in talking to you about anything after that...
And you will slander people, we will ban you forever and I will not vote that you will change, no way!!!!

...I don't want to argue with you! Why?...

Show me where it's written?
Since it's there, maybe it's worth updating the info a bit? Or at least in ICQ, even half a word.
You did read ICQ, Pete? Maybe it was worth writing there first after all?

Well, this is all very amusing. This is called: "I am the master of my word! I give it when I want, I take it back when I want" :D Why does this "taking back" only happen when the tournament is already in the semi-final stage? :confused: And even if a player who has a ЧМЧ (World Champion Marker) does get a spot in FB, he still won't be able to play anyway, because his participation contradicts the rules. So why beat around the bush? I don't get it...

And wasn't it the case that the ЧМЧ doesn't forbid anything, only warns? Or has that been cancelled already?

This scandal, for example, surprised me very much. The situation through my eyes: "Some noob found a Heroes site, registered, and started playing online. Not taking the game, the forum, or the people seriously, he started cheating blatantly. And serious people, adult people, respected, who have achieved something in real life, snapped like dogs and started trashing each other, leaving the forum, quitting Heroes, etc." Although it was enough to just be a bit patient and figure things out. It turned out that some passing cheater, who doesn't care about anything, almost destroyed what was built over years. And the blame for everything lies with the inadequate behavior on the part of the so-called "victims" — Loi, invisible etc.

Fortunately, all users have the opportunity to contact the administration. When I summed up the results of the survey on Vitalik, I wrote a letter to the Creator about removing the ЧМЧ. He was surprised by such a strong reaction from players to the ЧМЧ, and he decided to reconsider the mechanism for awarding markers. Unfortunately, he doesn't have enough real time for this... I won't post excerpts from his letters, but he made it clear that he is not satisfied with the situation surrounding the ЧМЧ.

...Pit, Dubrovin, Darty, Spirit, Cash and others — come to an agreement among yourselves and don't drag the whole forum into your disputes.

How do you work with students on math problems? You explain the problem and ask a question. The student must solve the problem and give an answer. If you change the conditions later, the solution and the answer will be different.
It's the same here. You gave me the conditions and asked for an answer. I gave it to you. How could I know that it was only half the truth? Later you changed the conditions. And later you got a different answer. But why do you think the answer should be the same? Well, it doesn't seem like the stage matters much to you... In my bracket, one player has been eager to play for over two months, but there's no opponent... So he'll make it to the finals...

It's unclear. You were the organizer of FB-1. Did the organizer not read the regulations, which clearly state this? Or have you already forgotten? And have you forgotten that vitalic was removed from the tournament? How could this be bypassed and the winner of the Championship be included from one of the Qualifiers? Is this another half-truth?

Or do we want a repeat of the situation with Vigo in the same FB-1, when the players "dumped" him? He then wisely disappeared from the forum, but now he's back. And the questions about him still hang in the air. It seems that we need to clarify the situation.

And instead of "etc.", who should it be? Isn't it LeBron? The third banned player? But in your context, he wouldn't look the way you'd like, would he? That's why "etc."? And is this another half-truth?

Are you now responsible for removing the Championship title? Please inform us of the content of the Creator's letter. We need to know how to live. Otherwise, it's another half-truth...

The poll about vitalic was conducted very cleverly. Again, a half-truth in your post, those who were in time voted, and the poll was closed (10 days). Moreover, there were no answers to really serious questions. It's interesting that only three out of 10 participants in FB-3 took part in it. I found it already closed.

And vitalic has already "thanked" his most loyal supporter in the Portal Cup.

He was last on ICQ on Sunday, only talking to Pavel, trying to understand the meaning of the amendment... Since he finally understood it only on Monday, and there was no way to get on ICQ, he didn't answer.

Loi closed the topic, but the poll remained open. I can't say when it was closed.

So, Pasha initiated this poll on his own, without prior discussion?