Poll regarding changes to the AK regulations.

...I don't want to argue with you! Why?...

Same here. It seems we're not arguing, right?

Show me where it's written?
Since it's there, maybe it's worth updating the info a bit? Or at least in ICQ, even half a word.
You did read ICQ, Pete? Maybe it was worth writing there first after all?

Artyom, almost everything I wrote in my previous post was on the forum. How was I supposed to know which topics you read and which you don't? I've always answered all your questions, haven't I? And as for what I wrote on Tuesday, it would be good if the other organizers read it too, not just you on ICQ, and in such volume at that... I was last on ICQ on Sunday, only talked to Pavel, trying to understand the meaning of the amendment... Since I finally understood it only on Monday and had no chance to get on ICQ, I didn't respond.
It's worth updating the info, and not just there, but I haven't gotten around to it; some more important forum business keeps coming up...

------------------------

A lot in our life depends on one's point of view. For one person, the glass is half full, for another, half empty. Kostya, you very often have some kind of half-truth. It's not like you lied, but you didn't tell the truth either.

Well, this is all very amusing. This is called: "I am the master of my word! I give it when I want, I take it back when I want" :D Why does this "taking back" only happen when the tournament is already in the semi-final stage? :confused: And even if a player who has a ЧМЧ (World Champion Marker) does get a spot in FB, he still won't be able to play anyway, because his participation contradicts the rules. So why beat around the bush? I don't get it...

How do they work with math students? They explain the problem conditions and ask a question. The student must solve the problem and give an answer. If you then change the conditions, the solution and answer will be different.
Same here. You gave me the conditions and asked for the answer. I gave it to you. How was I supposed to know that this is a half-truth? Then you changed the conditions. And then you got a different answer. But why do you think the answer should be the same? Well, the stage doesn't seem to bother you much... In my quarterfinal bracket, one player has been itching to play for over two months now, no opponent in sight... It might go all the way to the final...

And wasn't it the case that the ЧМЧ doesn't forbid anything, only warns? Or has that been cancelled already?

It's unclear. You were an organizer of FB-1. Did the organizer really not read the rules, which clearly state this point? Or have you already forgotten? And forgotten that vitalic was disqualified from the tournament? How then can this be circumvented and a ЧМЧ (World Champion Marker) holder from one of the Qualifiers be inserted? Another half-truth?
Or do we want a repeat of the situation with Vigo in that same FB-1, when the players ghosted him? He wisely disappeared from the forum back then, but now he's risen again. And the questions for him are still hanging in the air. It seems we'll have to clarify the situation after all.

This scandal, for example, surprised me very much. The situation through my eyes: "Some noob found a Heroes site, registered, and started playing online. Not taking the game, the forum, or the people seriously, he started cheating blatantly. And serious people, adult people, respected, who have achieved something in real life, snapped like dogs and started trashing each other, leaving the forum, quitting Heroes, etc." Although it was enough to just be a bit patient and figure things out. It turned out that some passing cheater, who doesn't care about anything, almost destroyed what was built over years. And the blame for everything lies with the inadequate behavior on the part of the so-called "victims" — Loi, invisible etc.

And instead of "etc.", who should be there? LeBron maybe? The third one banned? It's just that in your context, he wouldn't look the way you'd like him to? Hence "etc."? And this is a half-truth too?

Fortunately, all users have the opportunity to contact the administration. When I summed up the results of the survey on Vitalik, I wrote a letter to the Creator about removing the ЧМЧ. He was surprised by such a strong reaction from players to the ЧМЧ, and he decided to reconsider the mechanism for awarding markers. Unfortunately, he doesn't have enough real time for this... I won't post excerpts from his letters, but he made it clear that he is not satisfied with the situation surrounding the ЧМЧ.

Are you now the one responsible for removing the ЧМЧ? Please, acquaint us with the contents of the Creator's letter. We need to know how to proceed. Otherwise, it's another half-truth...

The survey on vitalic was conducted very cleverly. Again a half-truth in your post — whoever was quick enough voted, and the survey was closed (10 days). Moreover, there were never any answers to the truly serious questions. Interestingly, only three out of 10 participants of FB-3 took part in it. I discovered it when it was already closed.

Well, and vitalic has already "thanked" his most loyal defender in the Portal Cup.

...Pit, Dubrovin, Darty, Spirit, Cash and others — come to an agreement among yourselves and don't drag the whole forum into your disputes.

Yep, some nonsense... And it eats up a ton of time...