zloy_romantik (Blue, Barbarian, Gurney, Gurney) def Scorp (Red, Tower, Eine, Eine) see replay 115
Unclear game, unclear result... :D
Thanks for the game. See you in team battles;)
I confirm )) Unclear game ))
Thank you )) See you in team battles.
New here? I'm Roha — want a quick tour?
zloy_romantik (Blue, Barbarian, Gurney, Gurney) def Scorp (Red, Tower, Eine, Eine) see replay 115
Unclear game, unclear result... :D
Thanks for the game. See you in team battles;)
05.06.2010 Gomunguls (Blue, Dungeon, Shakti, Shakti) def Satyr (Red, Rampart, Kirr, Kirr) 2SM4d(3), 1.3.3
Thank you for the game!
The last debtors of the tournament!
Alessandro-Logisti k has the information, a report will be provided.

I have a question regarding this match:
Hardcore+ draw Looser
I read in some thread that Looser was caught cheating 100% by revealing the map during the game. The thing is, during our game, I was also quite sure that he was looking at the map. Unfortunately, I don't remember the details exactly anymore, but in the end, our match was declared a draw. I would like to know why this result was not changed in connection with the evidence of Looser's unfair play, after which I became absolutely convinced that he also played unfairly against me. Please investigate this situation. As I understand it, 2-3 people are selected, and in the event of my loss to Captain, I will not pass, although I have victories against the top players Gomunguls and FireToSky, but I will be short of exactly 0.5 points to qualify from the qualifying round, which I could have received for a victory over Looser.
3. For each played match, participants must submit a report and confirmation. Saves of all matches must be saved until the end of the tournament and presented upon first request by the tournament organizers or any member of the AC.
Thank you for your response. I personally believe that a player who has been eliminated from the competition (regardless of the reason) should not be able to influence the final outcome of the tournament. A loser is out. But what if there were players who simply didn't have time to play against him? Then what? Would some players have easy wins in the standings? If we think logically, Hardcore is at least entitled to a game against a bot. Or does "strictly individual" mean "strictly biased"?
Thank you for your response. Well, I personally believe that a player who has been eliminated from the competition (regardless of the reason) should not be able to influence the final outcome of the tournament. The loser is out. But what if there were players who simply didn't have time to play against him? Would they get free points in the standings? If we think about it logically, Hardcore has the right to at least play against a bot. Or does "strictly individual" mean "strictly biased"?