Skip to content

Posts from Round table

5.0 (2 ratings)
In reply to Redwhait
User Avatar
Auto-translated
redwhait

You haven't managed a single decent victory against us yet.
Whose fault is that :D :D :D, the players'?
In reply to Redwhait
User Avatar
Auto-translated
redwhait
You're so smart, show me where I haven't confirmed even one loss on any of the resources?
And this one confirmed it too and didn't insist on ANYTHING! He just stated the fact that he messed up and that's it!
And so far, you haven't had a single decent victory against us, so the 3rd game will decide who is right ;)
To surrender and give the victory to your opponent is worse than losing in a fight)):smile49:
Ушел с героев, пока пряники)
In reply to Dirty_Player
User Avatar
Auto-translated
Dirty_Player
If you get distracted by things at home, you should account for that with your time, not your shared time, out of respect for your opponent. Does that make sense?
Whew. I almost responded rudely. I don't have the nerves for it anymore. Then I decided to have a smoke first (even though I haven't smoked since I was a kid :D). Anyway, I sat down, counted to 100, took a deep breath of fresh air, and now I can calmly respond: I might get distracted during the game, YOU might get distracted during the game, ANYONE might get distracted during the game. Does that make sense? (C) :) And it's just as logical to respect that. With mutual respect for each other, none of your silly restrictions are needed. Spit in my face if that's not true.
Всем удачи ! И Морали !
In reply to Redwhait
User Avatar
Auto-translated
redwhait
For now, you haven't had a single decent victory against us, so the 3rd game will decide who's right ;)

well, the victories weren't exactly "normal," even though they were valid – we're to blame for that ;)
but I promise I'll fight to the end, although I don't really like losing :D and I don't do restarts either, unless the game is somehow playable, and I never intentionally create a losing situation for myself :smile35:
although, even if I win the 3rd game, it won't really matter anymore.... :smile27:
"...the personal strengths and weaknesses of a leader are no true indication of the merits of his cause"

(с) Roger Zelazny
In reply to wowa
User Avatar
Auto-translated
Hey, you... go ahead and lose to Satyr already... otherwise, Sticky and I will be playing after you for another month :D
In reply to Kash
User Avatar
Auto-translated
Kash
Hey, you should probably lose to Satyr already... otherwise, Sticky and I will be stuck playing after you for another month :D

But he doesn't want to win against me yet((((
I've been chasing him for almost 2 weeks now, but it seems he wants to prolong the fun... namely, by letting Gooshi get beaten by the wunderkind-cult, who is a real pain and gains 200% experience :D :D :D
"...the personal strengths and weaknesses of a leader are no true indication of the merits of his cause"

(с) Roger Zelazny
In reply to Wlk777
User Avatar
Auto-translated
Playing tournament games on unlimited maps is absurd, in my opinion. I watched a game of Neo-Cobra))), interportal. It was unlimited. People spent 40-50 minutes on each turn. Because all the decisions are so important that they rethought everything 3 times! On HL templates, where there are 3-4 strong heroes and everyone fights with a large army, the time factor in battles allows the games to be completed in a reasonable time. I am sure that on unlimited maps, 90% of players will take significantly longer than without it (everyone I played unlimited with, including myself, took an average of 1.5 times longer). And not 1% as the respected Valentin claims! On the HL template, this is +2-3 hours, or even more. Maybe on SMK, where everything is straightforward, unlimited doesn't significantly prolong the game. But, as they say, not all SMK maps are the same.
РП (Реальное папство!)
*Автосейвы не беру и не даю.

Скачать WT (Чат, античит, одновременный ход) http://www.heroeswt.net/download.php

Награда Лучшему игроку сезона Осень 2009 за Оплот
User Avatar
Auto-translated
I would draw the following conclusions regarding our discussion:
1. Pause in battles — personally, I like SoD more; sometimes you need to hang on when the phone rings or something else... the phone won't wait while I take my turn and pass it, so that the opponent, like in TE, can wait and not take the turn.

2. The less time per turn, the faster the games go. There seem to be no disputes with this fact :)

3. Battles with ballistas — yes, it's tryharding and disrespecting the opponent, but they are not that frequent, and anyone would do it if they ended up in such a situation — for example, a scout hero with a cannon was running, running, running, and then the opponent — an elf town with a bunch of dwarves-centaurs.

4. The lighter really saves time. Therefore, for those who have the opportunity — come back to the 4-minute limit ;)
Дипломатия - искусство говорить собаке "хорошая собачка" до тех пор пока не найдешь подходящую палку.
In reply to Captain
User Avatar
Auto-translated
2. The less time per turn, the faster the games. It seems like there are no arguments against this fact.

There is!
Me:)

Regarding the 4-minute and 6-minute time limits, I've often seen that games last longer with the 4-minute limit. The main reason is that the gameplay is weaker, which means more game days are required (losses due to giving up don't count). For example, on Jebus, a game with a 4-minute time limit will often last longer, even with Vitaly's program.

I have a good attitude towards unlimited time, but not in tournaments, of course.

P.S. In my personal opinion, a 4000+400 control is closer to 4 minutes per turn than to 6.
TE players usually play without morale and GS, so battles are faster and more monotonous, often on autopilot (as Yuri wrote). But even on SOD, for example, ordinary ogres in 7 stacks with GS can cause problems on an unusual terrain. You consider the protection against morale first, and secondly, to prevent someone from accidentally blocking the passage. That's why it takes longer.
Земля нуля.
Все в ней нулево и кукольно.
User Avatar
Auto-translated
I remember the first time I played against Oelm, it was around the 6-minute mark, and it was my 4th or 5th online game. I didn't understand why people would play for 10-15 minutes! And now, even in a standard match, 6 minutes with a lighter isn't always enough.
In reply to FireToSky
User Avatar
Auto-translated
Yeah, I managed to lose in both games within the first week (a scout hero killed pixies for a treasure chest on 2 Wyverns, morale wasn't in my favor, the lineup was tough, and the lack of a Wyvern had a huge impact; in the second game, I wasted a ton of conflux on a Dragon Fly Hive, hoping to take it on 113), then out of pride I tried to save the situation in every possible way, but never managed to pull it off :D
Земля нуля.
Все в ней нулево и кукольно.
In reply to Forrest
User Avatar
Auto-translated
Forrest

I'm sure that on the unlimited map, 90% of players will spend significantly more time than without it (all the people I played with on unlimited maps, including myself, spent an average of 1.5 times longer). And not 1%, as the respected Valentin claims! On the HL template, this is +2-3 hours, or even more.
Maybe on the small map, where everything is straightforward, the unlimited map doesn't significantly prolong the game.
But, as they say, not all small maps are the same.
For now, unfortunately, over 90% of games are played on small maps, and there's no point in playing the HL template if there isn't enough time to properly learn it, as I think. I meant 1% of games that are UNREASONABLY prolonged (and I haven't seen this percentage), but when both players spend 40-50 minutes, it means they are okay with it, and it's better, in my opinion, to spend 2-3 extra hours than to read reports like "I was distracted in real life and left the hero on the Corgriff before the Guardian, and was punished for it."
Всем удачи ! И Морали !
In reply to PReDS
User Avatar
Auto-translated
Cool. I understand everything except for one thing: why didn't the griffins move?

Added 4 minutes later
The only thing that comes to mind is that the goblin was, let's say, in the seventh stack. Then, theoretically, the griffins could have waited, and the goblin moved with morale... Some kind of nonsense)) It will be interesting to find out the solution.
In reply to Kash
User Avatar
Auto-translated
What's the point? A single Consul, two stacks were killed by Angels and Mines, and Wolves positioned themselves on the left to protect the single units, or just to post it here. :D
Земля нуля.
Все в ней нулево и кукольно.

Statistics

Welcome our newest member: Emil