Skip to content

Posts from On-line rating (discussion)

No ratings yet — be the first to rate!
Open
Create a rating
120 voters
Single choice Public votes
Sign in to participate in this poll.
Poll results will be visible after you vote or when the poll closes.
User Avatar
#322
Auto-translated
I like the automated rating calculation system on the World Cup League website, organized by SAG. When players start a game, one of them creates a game report, and the other confirms it. Visitors to the site can see which games have started in the list. After the game ends, either player can complete the report, indicating the winner. The rating is calculated immediately. The opponent has the right to cancel the report if they disagree with something. The only downside is that there is no option for a draw, but overall, the instant recalculation of the rating is a good thing.
В дикім полі
User Avatar
#323
Auto-translated
Instant recalculation of the rating is a good thing.

It would be worth creating an automated rating system just for this.
User Avatar
#324
Auto-translated
Excellent idea! Thanks to the automatic rating calculation, the number of games will increase, as will the desire to win and achieve excellence, and, most importantly, it will be possible to track daily progress in the season.
Ушел с героев, пока пряники)
User Avatar
#325
Auto-translated
automatic rating (c)

This is all great, of course, and I myself look with envy at other resources with their automatic rating system, but other questions arise:

1. Who will be able to do this for us?

2. Who will spend their time and do it?
Сейчас балуюсь этим https://vcmi.eu/download/
За то что нейтралы не бегают за единичкой, для меня это уже стоит того
User Avatar
#326
Auto-translated
We want a leaderboard! And we've been wanting it for a long time! :(
ну это вообще всем аргамездец!© Kash
без авто:smile20:
Человек - игрушка Бога. Этому - то и надо следовать. Надо жить играя.
Платон.
In reply to SpiriTT
User Avatar
#327
Auto-translated
SpiriTT
We really want a leaderboard! And we've wanted it for a long time! :(
I still think that, given the increasing number of players every day, we should cancel the mandatory confirmation of reports and set a limit for participation in the ranking, say, 5 games. Otherwise, Vitaly will get completely exhausted from counting. IMHO.
Всем удачи ! И Морали !
In reply to Wlk777
User Avatar
#328
Auto-translated
Wlk777
I still think that, given the increasing number of players every day, we should cancel the mandatory confirmation of reports and set a limit for participation in the ranking, say, 5 games. Otherwise, Vitaly will get completely exhausted from counting. IMHO=[/QUOTE]

Are you counting everything manually??????
In reply to Wlk777
User Avatar
#329
Auto-translated
Wlk777
I still think that, given the increasing number of players every day, we should cancel the mandatory confirmation of reports and set a limit for participation in the ranking, say, 5 games. Otherwise, Vitaly will be completely exhausted from counting. IMHO.[/QUOTE] With the current (semi-manual) system of counting, canceling the confirmation of reports will not speed up the ranking calculation. And even more so with an automated system. Let the confirmations remain, that's what I think. Moderators, please move this and the previous 2 posts to the appropriate topic. We need to decide what to do with the current counting system. Who can take on the task of converting it to an automated one (similar to the one created by Dreamcatcher)? We can ask Dreamcatcher himself to create such a system for HW - if he agrees, it will take him half an hour. We can develop a system from scratch. I might, someday, take on the second option (although the first is faster and easier - nothing needs to be done, just ask :)), but we can't rely on that. But the ranking calculation system on HeroesWorld should be preserved in any case, without assimilating it or merging it with the rankings of other sites and systems (this is patriotism for HW speaking :o).
Клан Homo homini

Charity suffereth long, and is kind; charity envieth not; charity vaunteth not itself, is not puffed up,
Doth not behave itself unseemly, seeketh not her own, is not easily provoked, thinketh no evil;
Rejoiceth not in iniquity, but rejoiceth in the truth;
Beareth all things, believeth all things, hopeth all things, endureth all things. Charity never faileth...
User Avatar
#330
Auto-translated
Hello everyone, I also really want to see a rating that updates in real-time, not just once every six months, so I have a **specific suggestion – to motivate someone** to implement this project by contributing a certain amount to an electronic account. Judging by the poll, there are 70+ people who want this, so I think the amount from each person would be small, around **100-200 rubles**. If needed, I can talk to Dreamcatcher about the implementation. **Let's hear your thoughts, everyone.**
User Avatar
#331
Auto-translated
Yes, considering the significant increase in the number of players and the lack of time for the host, I think we risk not having a rating at all. We probably need to come up with something...
Всем удачи ! И Морали !
In reply to Wlk777
User Avatar
#332
Auto-translated
Wlk777
Yes, it seems that due to the large increase in the number of players and the lack of time for the host, we risk being left without a ranking system altogether. We need to come up with something...
Yes, we'll figure something out. In the near future, I will write to the Creator and ask about creating an automated system.
User Avatar
#333
Auto-translated
I will explain the problems with creating an automatic rating.
Using other people’s developments won’t work, first, because of mismatched formulas for calculating the rating, and second, the design of the project should match the design of ХВ, not be stolen from others. Besides, we already have our own traditions and requirements for the information in rating tables.
Writing the program itself for entering reports and calculating the rating is not difficult. The main problem is integrating it into our website. To do this, you need to have access to the source files and, naturally, permission from the owner of the site. I.e., ONLY the Creator can do this.

I asked the Creator about this. Here is his response:
Creator
... in the coming months, I plan to reach the final stage of development and provide both tournament organizers and users with an automated tournament organization system, which will already include an automated rating.
So let’s wait, and for now we will calculate the rating ourselves.
Vitaliy is currently very short on time, which is why there have been such delays with the autumn season. I don’t know when it was ever like this, with the rating being calculated once every six months :confused: ... No need to panic. We won’t be left without a rating. There are some ideas on how to make this work easier for the host. I’ll try to think it over and do some programming. By spring, I hope everything will get back to normal.
User Avatar
#334
Auto-translated
We had almost 800 matches in the autumn season. Entering information for each match across 15 categories is a huge amount of work. We need to hire a dedicated employee.
I am currently developing a program that reads, recognizes, and converts reports into a standard format. It recognizes over 80%. And it also depends on the players to increase this percentage.
Currently, the program calculates both permanent and seasonal ratings. The near-term plan is to include all other statistics as well.
It turns out that there is an incredibly interesting battle for first place in the current season. The leader changes almost every day. I will try to finish it as soon as possible so that by the end of the season we can have an exciting spectacle.
I created a topic Problems with the Season. Please take some time to read it.
I posted a list of unconfirmed reports there. Confirmations are needed for accurate statistics.
I will also post the program's requirements for reports there. The requirements haven't changed much, but the program likes it when they are followed.
User Avatar
#335
Auto-translated
Pete is making (or has already made) a program for automatic rating calculation. A huge request to everyone to write their nicknames correctly. Writing Valyushka instead of Valeska is also undesirable, but still tolerable.
But an incorrectly written nickname means an incorrect rating.

There is no such user Loi on HeroesWorld,
there is a user loi.

There is no such user Злой Романтик on HeroesWorld,
there is a user злой_романтик.

I'm getting a bit tired of fixing the same thing over and over
In reply to Kash
User Avatar
#336
Auto-translated
No such user
StinkyFingaz, StikyFingaz, StickiFingaz, Sticky Fingaz
No such user on HeroesWorld!!!!!!!111111111111