Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Didn't want to interrupt your off-topic conversation, but I will :)
I'm reading it correctly:)
I won't quote that overused phrase again, highlighting the parts that are important to me. I think we both understand the meaning: A person can live alone. They can even masturbate alone (I don't want to write that word), but it won't be as enjoyable as with someone else. However, it is not normal for a person to feel towards themselves the same feelings that a man feels towards a woman, parents, or children. If left alone, this worthless citizen will only eat, sleep, and so on, i.e., simply exist. And he will also think that he is the reason for the downfall of humanity. Why would I need that? Therefore, the first option is better.
Now, about the main questions. In fact, Hollywood has explored this theme many times – how many times has Bruce Willis saved the whole world, even at the cost of his own life? So, one might want to answer that yes, I will save it, this world, and the people in it. But after thinking calmly, and remembering, by the way, my sweaty palms before the dentist's office, one begins to doubt one's own abilities. And sincerely hopes that somehow it will all work out without your help. And if some kind of meteorite suddenly falls, what can you do about it? In reality (this just came to mind), you can't answer this question correctly – because one person, without anyone like him, is nothing. Neither as a hero, nor as an anti-hero.
the local low-life cadets – discharged soldiers and veterans
Dividing people into “low-life” and “not low-life” is very foolish and immature. Besides, there are no veterans there anymore.
Well, if you don't give anyone a chance to prove themselves, what can be done with you, and aren't you exaggerating a bit?
Of course, you are right. Personally, I believe you. A young man in his early twenties suggests competing with a minor forum visitor. Sorry that I had to question your patriotism. It truly reaches great heights.
Dividing people into "commoners" and "non-commoners" is very foolish and immature. Besides, there are no "old-timers" left.
Of course, you're right. Personally, I believe you. A young man, barely out of his twenties, suggests competing with a minor forum visitor. Sorry that I had to question your patriotism. It truly reaches great heights.
A person is judged and evaluated by their actions... if they can't do anything worthwhile and only engage in trivial activities with the weak or rely on their authority, then who are they?... They are not people! As for the "face" comment, I admit I was wrong, but the issue is different... Let him demand whatever proof he wants... How do you prove that someone isn't just talking big, since everyone seems so good on words... And what are you all doing here, talking and laughing, but can you actually back it up?... Oh, everyone is an angel, everyone is right, and everyone else is wrong...
Cash, from your last post, it seems that you dislike the second option because it would cause you moral anguish and because you don't want to feel like you're back in school? Are these inconveniences enough to make you want to end your life?:) "Why would I want to be tormented by anything?" - this thought reeks of all those broken, suicidal losers, don't you think? Especially since it's just "conscience" here, which essentially only represents the values instilled in a child during their upbringing by their parents.
Left alone, this worthless citizen will only eat, sleep, and so on, i.e., simply exist.
If you take the average worthless citizen, what do they do right now beyond what's mentioned? They also go to work. They save up for an apartment through a mortgage. Perhaps they are a father who is already losing interest in his wife. Is that much more? This kind of person perfectly fits the term "boor" mentioned above, doesn't it? If one of the main drawbacks of a dying humanity is the reduction in leisure options, then that's... immoral, bad, I don't know how else to express it.
This is stubbornness... Stubbornness and stupidity, not principles... it's been a long time since it's time to distinguish between the two)
Here's an example of fanaticism)))) I haven't killed you yet for all your sins... you're confusing a gift from God with scrambled eggs:D
Stubbornness stems from what? From a principle. You just don't seem to understand what principles I'm talking about) Where is the fanaticism here?) Morning
And this phrase shows how they hammered consumerist dogmas into your head back then. Finally, the bloody totalitarian tyrant has been overthrown, and the people are moving towards a paradise existence - a civilized democracy and the opportunity to buy a "Snickers" chocolate bar together with cheap Chinese slippers instead of the required "Moscow Komsomolets." A true consumer paradise.
Oh, explain it in simple terms, because my brain doesn't understand))
Stubbornness stems from what? From principle. You just don't seem to understand what principles I'm talking about. Where is the fanaticism here?
Stubbornness is when a person doesn't acknowledge any opinion other than their own, and principles are actions based on moral and spiritual upbringing that you consider to be right... Principle - your friend has a girlfriend that you are crazy about... how will you act - will you fundamentally do nothing to get the girl... Principle - again, the example of Arandor with the cookie - will you give the last delicious cookie to your friend or not...
If you take the average, unremarkable citizen, what else are they doing right now besides what's been mentioned? They're probably going to work. Saving up for an apartment with a mortgage. Maybe they're a father, already losing interest in his wife. Is that so much more? In fact, such a person perfectly fits the term "boor" mentioned above, doesn't he? If one of the main drawbacks of a dying humanity is the reduction of leisure options, then that's... immoral, bad, I don't know how else to express it.
It's immoral and bad to take the average, unremarkable citizen. By the way, would you share your secret – where do you get them? And how do you determine it – by the sign on their chest that says "Average, unremarkable citizen"? (Of course, we are definitely not average, not statistical, and not unremarkable!). And please, decide something about the term "boor" – is its use immoral, or are there exceptions? Well, like in the case of the average... (well, you know what comes next). ...The smell of a troll was clearly felt in the air...
kcfgogbfalgfl
