Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Posts from Amendment to section 5.2.1 of the Hv rules (regarding quick-cast spells).
I've posted the reports on Dream's website. I'm waiting for new volunteers to help convince them, preferably from the top 15 players in World of Xeen.
Added 1 hour 5 minutes ago
I found these threads in the archive. I'm ready to consider this proposal. ;)
I won't refuse, but how can this be implemented, since Mullich isn't chosen as the starting hero...? By the way, I'd like to play with Kiryu on Solmyr.
I've posted the reports on Dream's website. I'm waiting for new volunteers to help convince them, preferably from the top 15 players in World of Xeen.
Added 1 hour 5 minutes ago
I found these threads in the archive. I'm ready to consider this proposal. ;)
Great job, Tyoma! You proved the correctness of your position with action! Yes, you're right, we're really looking forward to the report on the game with Britvachka! :p
What voting results are needed to make changes to the rules?
Most likely, more than 50% of votes FOR, right?
But!
Given the emergence of a new topic "Solmyr, Demeer, Aislin..." with related polls and discussions, let's postpone the rule changes for a few days (but no later than 10/17/2009, when the poll will be automatically closed). And we will decide based on the results of the new poll.
Charity suffereth long, and is kind; charity envieth not; charity vaunteth not itself, is not puffed up, Doth not behave itself unseemly, seeketh not her own, is not easily provoked, thinketh no evil; Rejoiceth not in iniquity, but rejoiceth in the truth; Beareth all things, believeth all things, hopeth all things, endureth all things. Charity never faileth...
In the new thread, the question is incorrectly phrased. There should be a choice between 2 options, not 3. If 50% is sufficient, why haven't the changes already been implemented? The poll on this topic ended a long time ago.
The question in the new thread is incorrectly phrased. There should be a choice between 2 options, not 3. If 50% is sufficient, why haven't the changes already been made? The poll on this topic ended a long time ago.
I understand that the changes will be made regardless, but the question is which ones? Either unban everyone, or unban everyone except Solmyr, Deemer, and Aislin.
I understand that changes will be made regardless, but the question is, what kind of changes? Either unban everyone, or unban everyone except Solmyr, Deemer, and Aislin.
Or maybe introduce a temporary rule for a test period, for example, 2 months? Let people play, then they can express their opinions again – based on real results – and then make a final decision on this issue.... P.S. I didn't vote because I'm not completely sure whether we should completely exclude this option...
Стратегия - искусство возможного.
Первое правило форума : "Хвалу и клевету приемли равнодушно И не оспаривай глупца" (с)
Новичкам: ВНИМАТЕЛЬНО перечитайте ВЕСЬ первый пост по нижеприведенной ссылке и 90% ваших вопросов отпадут( на остальные 10% с удовольствием отвечу): Правила онлайн игр
Message from bRitvo4kA What voting results are needed to make changes to the rules?
Most likely, more than 50% of votes in favor, right?
Not necessarily. As far as I know, there is no established procedure for making changes to the rules; if I'm wrong, please correct me.
Rules are important; they significantly affect the interests of all players. Perhaps it's not worth simplifying the procedure for making changes to them. For example, changes to a constitution usually require a qualified majority (67 or 75%) and more than one vote.
With a procedure that is too simple, the rules may change frequently and unsystematically, which will only complicate their application. The ease of use of the rules is determined not only by their brevity but also by their consistency.
And in a more recent poll in the adjacent thread, only 23% voted for the same option (full unban). Moreover, in both cases, this is a percentage of the number of people who voted. If calculated based on the number of people eligible to vote, the percentage would be even lower.
The voting here is more numerous than in the other thread and is ongoing. And accepting the 1st point proposed in the other topic is practically pointless, as they will only choose these listed heroes as the main characters.
Do you really think that if all the specialists are unbanned, everyone will start winning with them? Not at all. Those who missed them might start playing, but they are unlikely to win consistently. In fact, half of the games in Heroes of Might and Magic should ideally be played with mages. They might be useful in some scenarios, but not in the most played game mode.
The voting here is more numerous than in the other thread and is ongoing. But accepting the single point proposed in the other topic is practically pointless, as they will only choose the heroes listed in the exceptions as the main character.
Do you really think that if all the special heroes are unbanned, everyone will start winning with them? Not at all. Some people who missed them might start playing, but they are unlikely to win consistently. In general, half of the games in Heroes of Might and Magic should ideally be played with mages. They might be useful in some scenarios, but not in the most popular game mode.
Here, there are 39 votes, and there are 30. The difference is not significant, especially considering that this poll has been running for much longer. What is more important is that some of those who voted for a complete unban here are now voting for a partial unban or even for keeping the ban as it is. This confirms that the ease of making changes will lead to random, chaotic results that could create more problems for players than the rather controversial shortcomings of the existing rules.
Arguing about whether or not to unban them is pointless, as all the arguments "for" and "against" have already been made, and some have even been confirmed by gameplay. There is nothing more to add.
Added after 4 minutes Wlk777
Hmm... What's going on? I'd like to know who doesn't have the right to vote here? ;)
I am willing to grant this right to all of humanity; then the percentage in favor of unbanning will be very small.
Attempts to restrict the right of forum visitors to participate in the voting were made not so long ago; if necessary, I can provide a link.
KobRa_RR
