Posts from Should we ban the Griffin Conservatory and the Hive of Serpents?

Let me remind you that this discussion in this vein started with your remark: "I think all these arguments are crap."

Yes, before that, there was my phrase: "So, the idea is crap; we've seen it before."

But the difference between them is that my phrase is 1) true, 2) theoretically justified, and 3) practically justified.

Your phrase, on the other hand, is supported only by vague arguments like: "As far as I can see, most games are decided either by a rush or by whoever gets more ducks/angels. It's not serious when, in the 2nd week, they come with 7-9 angels; what kind of double-build can counter that?" And they are vague because if there are no ducks and angels, you get almost the same result, with the difference that the rush will be a little later, but it will be unstoppable (because they got hidden/native castles).

So, in my opinion, it's not the "canned" units that matter, but the ability to use advantages and turn unfavorable situations around.
Arguing isn't my thing. I said what I wanted to say.

if you supposedly read what I wrote, then answer my question: why does the ban on the monster of the week (2-5 miserable creatures that still need to be built and bought, at best) not cause any particular objections, and no one calls it at least a stupid idea, while getting much larger and practically free troops is considered absolutely normal?

but for now, you're practically all alone.

You are wrong. Open your eyes – people don't argue with you because they haven't taken your words seriously for several months. By the way, they opened a poll, let's see who has more support here.

It's a pity that I don't see any understanding from almost anyone.

Well, the problem itself is relevant. It's just that the solution you proposed is even worse.

Is it possible, by tinkering with the templates, to reduce the number of generated conservatories and hives? If so, what could this lead to?