Posts from King's Bounty: The Legend Auto-translated

Warrior, I didn't mean to offend you, but you said that the game is at best a 3 out of 5. And I disagree with that. Many magazines gave this game almost perfect scores – almost 10 out of 10, and according to the voting on AG.ru, it seems to be recognized as the best game of the year. The vast majority of players expressed only the most positive feedback. Besides, this is our, Russian, development. How many successful Russian games do you know?... and you can overlook minor flaws. And also – in many games, you understand, how interesting and difficult it is to play on the highest difficulty level (especially in RPGs, although King's Bounty isn't that genre)! You can't judge a game when you're playing on an easy level and haven't learned all the nuances yet! P.S. I agree with AlexSpl, the ending of the game is rushed.

Three out of five seems pretty good to me. Igromania gave it an 8 out of 10. I'm not playing on easy, but on medium difficulty. It's not right to give the game a high rating just because it's Russian. And it's great that you disagree; everyone should have their own opinion. Although, to be honest, I've started to get into it more recently, especially after the battles with the Necromancers.

It's a decent game (especially while you're playing it). The game received high ratings not because it's Russian, but because it's well-made. Although it's designed in an old-school style, it's well-developed and interesting.

Just because something is related to Heroes doesn't mean it's good. Not all albums by the same artist are equally worthwhile. I haven't seen a worse game. 0 out of 100. Complete nonsense, a pathetic parody of the original, embellished with some fabricated rage. Everything is absurd, from the quests and battles to the stupid fences with motionless faces giving out these quests.

I agree, that's a constructive approach. List the specific points you dislike. At least, regarding the battles. I, for example, enjoyed the battles; you can come up with many diverse tactics if you put some thought into it. The idea of "Rage" is also well-implemented. The graphics are generally good. Although, without patches, it's quite terrible, yes.

Hmm... I wonder if this person has ever played King's Bounty before? No comment... The game is excellent, with wonderful graphics, and the thoughtfulness behind explaining things like rage is simply amazing...
Young man, I would advise you to study the game more and not rush through it, ignoring the storyline...

Yeah, he probably got frustrated early on with some minor issues and that's why he didn't like the game. As for King's Bounty, for me, the only downside is the monotony of the battles. In the sense that you have to repeat the same actions dozens of times, although, of course, 1.6 (or whatever version) looks better in this regard compared to 1.0 (or maybe it just seemed that way to me). But otherwise, the game is really good.

I hope they’ll add an autobattle feature in the expansion pack :P And in general, I would like it so that when a hero encounters too weak neutral creatures, they would run away (or at least not attack). This would likely solve the issue of boring battles.

Oh yeah! We need to pray for the auto-battle feature))) The main thing is that it works properly.

I don't know, I haven't played it, and I'm not a fan of the second game. But did you play for 3 days? Did you explore everything? Did you have 1000 battles, and were they all the same? I doubt you can experience the whole game in 3 days; it's more about the player's desire.

Well, I resisted playing the fifth installment for a couple of months, then realized I didn't want to play it. And here, on the fourth day of playing, I realized that I could spend my time doing something else. I just don't like the game, and I even wrote down why. You're probably right; the game is great, since most people seem to enjoy it. It's just that those who don't like it usually don't express their opinions on websites; I already regret starting this pointless discussion.

As I understand it, the game glitches even on licensed copies. And that means it was made purely to make money.

Please, name just one well-known game that isn't made for profit?
Nowadays, all games are made for profit!

Regarding the glitches, install patch 1.7 (it's 5MB) and the glitches will disappear. And this patch also fixes issues with the disc. ;)

I personally really liked the game, and you know why? It has an atmosphere, which has become quite rare lately.

Good luck.

It exists, but perhaps that's the only real advantage.
I read on the website today that in 5 days, almost 50 pages were filled with reports of bugs, glitches, freezes, and overheating. That's very abnormal. And their moderators' responses are particularly dismissive, like: "The game is mediocre, but ours is a masterpiece that requires amazing video resources. Put your graphics card in a safe place, and if you want to play, buy a new one." Something like that.

I read on the website today that in 5 days, almost 50 pages were filled with reports of problems, glitches, freezes, and overheating.

Hmm, it's not worth misleading people...
50 pages – you're exaggerating a bit... :smile04:
Realistically, as of April 13th, 17:00, there are four pages (73 messages).
And almost every post has a response from the developers.
Sometimes, you even come across "bugs" like this: click

Overall, the situation looks quite normal. I think 1-2 patches and everything will stabilize. ;)

Good luck.

No, definitely. I saw 13 pages filled with various glitches, and there were another 10 pages dedicated to overheating and freezing issues.
It seems they cleaned things up a bit now, but there was more of it yesterday evening. How can they make such mistakes and not bother to spend a couple of days rechecking and testing?