Heroes 6 - Discussion — General

Amko

3/7/2009 3:44 PM UTC

Auto-translated

Ugh... where did you all get the idea that H6 will be real-time? Seriously, someone just suggested it somewhere, and you all jumped on it to discuss. What if they make Heroes a multiplayer first-person shooter? Let's discuss that, shall we? Well done, nothing to say.

Правила форума
FAQ по Heroes VI
Форумная мафия

[readonly]

In reply to Amko

Werevolka

3/7/2009 5:50 PM UTC

Auto-translated

Amaranth

Ugh... why does everyone think that H6 will be real-time? Seriously, someone just suggested it somewhere, and now everyone is discussing it. What if they make Heroes a multiplayer first-person shooter? Let's discuss that. Well done, I have to say.

Well, let's assume we can discuss who would want to play as which hero and have fun in a multiplayer setting. )) People have learned from experience - if something bad CAN happen, it WILL happen.

Amko

3/7/2009 6:41 PM UTC

Auto-translated

Then, give me an example of when the TBS series mutated into an RTS. ;) However, if we reason this way, then yes, someone has to be the first.
I'm saying this because I don't think the people working at Ubisoft are complete idiots. Yes, there aren't as many fans of the Heroes series, but there are many people who simply love the HoMM series, and they probably wouldn't be thrilled with such changes either. In fact, it's not profitable for the company to only consider the opinions of casual players (and there aren't as many of them as they say here; after all, the PC platform is more geared towards advanced players). Knowledgeable people understand that they need to try to capture as large a share of players as possible, and not all of them are hopeless casuals.

Правила форума
FAQ по Heroes VI
Форумная мафия

[readonly]

Майор Вихрь

3/7/2009 7:43 PM UTC

Auto-translated

If we compare, RTS is still more popular than TBS. Otherwise, this infamous rumor wouldn't have caused so much hype. :) And, as mentioned, it's just an assumption, someone's speculation, even if it has some basis. There's also a well-founded opinion that if an RTS does come out in the Might and Magic universe, the title won't include the word "Heroes" (for details, I can direct you to the Heroes' Corner, specifically, to browse the news feed from the previous month, or read the topic with a similar name on the Nival forum). That is, there's a chance that we'll get new turn-based heroes, and it's not insignificant, assuming the developers are interested in further developing the series.

O God of Earth and Altar,
Bow down and hear our cry,
Our earthly rulers falter,
Our people drift and die,
The walls of gold entomb us,
The swords of scorn divide,
Take not thy thunder from us,
Take away our pride.

G.K. Chesterton: English Hymnal

In reply to Майор Вихрь

Wistrit

3/8/2009 4:41 AM UTC

Auto-translated

Then give me an example of when the TBS series mutated into an RTS. However, if we reason this way, then yes, someone has to be the first.

Warlords

If I'm not mistaken, they removed the turn-based mode from Fallout; everywhere, turn-based elements are being cut.

I am, of course, against Heroes becoming an RTS, but I would probably play it anyway.

Tomorrow holds no promises
Except the ones we've made

kcfgogbfalgfl

3/8/2009 9:04 AM UTC

Auto-translated

Warlords? Hmm, Warlords: Battlecry III used to be my favorite game.

I'm not really a fan of Heroes becoming an RTS, but I'd probably play it anyway.

I wouldn't mind either, if only my computer could handle it :smile04:. And I, for one, don't see anything wrong with the possibility of Heroes transitioning to real-time (in any case, people will still play the classic versions, especially Heroes of Might and Magic III). It's not worth putting in mega graphics while abandoning the turn-based mode. And they probably wouldn't even be called Heroes of Might and Magic 6. They'll come up with an original name, and we'll see.

Стартовый пост - Квенты - Разное -
Резара - Аксель - Орвальд - Эмилия -

Werevolka

3/10/2009 7:39 PM UTC

Auto-translated

Well, I wouldn't mind if an RPG game based on Heroes was created, as long as it didn't claim to be the 6th installment of the series. It might even be interesting to play once. And then go back to Heroes in its classic form: a turn-based strategy game.

Amko

3/10/2009 7:43 PM UTC

Auto-translated

RPG? Then it will be Might & Magic 10.

Правила форума
FAQ по Heroes VI
Форумная мафия

[readonly]

In reply to Amko

Kyle

3/11/2009 7:01 AM UTC

Auto-translated

Amaranth

RPG? Then it will be Might & Magic 10;)

Hmm, Might & Magic 10 has already been released... it's the well-known "Dark Messiah." The game itself is quite good, but there's not much left of the RPG elements... :(
I'm saying this because there's a chance that if Heroes 6 does come out, it might suffer the same fate.

Кто состоянием своим доволен, тому жить весело. (с)Алекса́ндр Васи́льевич Суво́ров

Ley

3/11/2009 8:31 AM UTC

Auto-translated

Really? :) The worst that could happen to them is a financial failure, like with the fourth installment. Although, it should be acknowledged that even then, they found a sufficient number of supporters. Comparing the tenth game to the sixth Heroes... I'm even afraid to imagine it.

"Единственное, что можно сказать с уверенностью об удаче - она изменит..."

In reply to Kyle

Amko

3/11/2009 9:50 AM UTC

Auto-translated

Kyle

hm, Might & Magic 10 has already been released... it's the well-known "Dark Messiah." The game itself is quite good, but there's not much left of the RPG elements... :(
I'm saying this because there's a chance that if Heroes 6 does come out, it might suffer the same fate.

No, Dark Messiah of Might & Magic is a good example of how a new game with a different name can be released under the same brand (in this case, M&M). In the case of "RTS-Heroes," it could be something like Units of M&M. And that can no longer be considered Heroes, in my opinion.
ps I wrote it clumsily, but I hope it's understandable...

Правила форума
FAQ по Heroes VI
Форумная мафия

[readonly]

Ty3o-ny3o

3/16/2009 7:45 PM UTC

Auto-translated

The only thing I would really like to see in Heroes 6 is the absence of that awful, Warcraft 3-inspired spirit that has plagued the series... Those who like it can play that game, as it has been around for a long time. But Heroes needs its own heroic atmosphere.

In reply to Ty3o-ny3o

Wistrit

3/17/2009 1:39 AM UTC

Auto-translated

What do you mean by "heroic"? And where in Heroes of Might and Magic is there a spirit reminiscent of Warcraft 3?

Tomorrow holds no promises
Except the ones we've made

Arandor

3/17/2009 6:57 AM UTC

Auto-translated

heroic – this refers to the style seen in the first, second, and third games, maybe even the fourth (though it's slightly different there).
It has the spirit of Warcraft in its graphics, like in the fifth game.
So much has been said about it, and you still don't understand (or haven't remembered), huh?))
P.S. Wouldn't it be easier to read the previous pages instead of asking the same thing over and over throughout the entire existence of this thread? (This applies to many, not just Vis)... As soon as a new person arrives and posts in this thread, the same people immediately come running to argue, prove something, and just add their two cents, which have already accumulated so much...

Be strong. Believe

Lord Vampire

3/17/2009 7:38 AM UTC

Auto-translated

There are definitely differences in the 4th installment. In the 5th, there aren't that many, and the ones that exist are designed to make the game more interesting and improve it, rather than destroy its mystique. Personally, I'm not expecting much from the 6th installment and don't really want it. The 5th is enough for me, and it will be for the next 50 years.