Posts from Puzzles
He thought he was a bird. Maybe?
No, you misunderstood me; I didn't think I was a bird. I mean, when he was vomiting, he tilted his head so far down that he fell out of the window.
No, you misunderstood me; I didn't think of myself as a bird. I mean, when he was vomiting, he tilted his head so far down that he fell out of the window.
A man comes to a cafe on a cliff and orders albatross meat. After it's brought to him, he cuts off a piece, eats it, opens the window, and jumps off the cliff. The question is, why?
P.S. I don't know the answer.
If there was only one incorrect answer, then 11 would know that there was one, and the 12th wouldn't know about any and would guess, and they would all be released the next morning.
Since they weren't released, those who knew about only one guessed about their own, and the next morning everyone was free.
About the Pear - you can't eat it: Aunt Grunya hanged herself)))
Hello from ancient novice!
ЗЫ: Когда я свободен для игры, в Асе у меня стоит состояние "Игры"-"Погоняем!", и я ищу Аськи с аналогичным состоянием.
You are on a TV show and are offered to open one of three doors. Behind one of the doors is a car, and behind the other two, there is nothing. You choose one of the doors, and the host opens one of the remaining two doors, revealing that there is no car behind it. You are then offered to change your decision (take the other door from the two remaining). The question is - does it make sense to do this?
I believe it doesn't matter, as the chance of choosing the door with the car is 50%.
Let's say there are three doors - 1, 2, and 3. The car is behind the first door.
If we initially chose the first door, then we don't need to change our decision to win.
If we chose the second door, then we should change our decision.
If we chose the third door, then we should change our decision.
Therefore, in two cases, we should change our decision, and in one case, we shouldn't, so the chances of winning by changing the door are 2/3.
From a logical point of view, yes, but in reality, it's not like that, and the decision needs to be changed.
Let's say there are three doors - 1, 2, and 3. A car is behind the first door.
If we initially chose the first door, then to win, we don't need to change our decision.
If we chose the second door, then we need to change our decision.
If we chose the third door, then we need to change our decision.
Therefore, in two cases, we need to change our decision, and in one case, we don't, so the chances of winning by changing the door are 2/3.
:smile28: [M] "Я и моя тень" - "I am and my shadow" :smile28:
:smile16:
You are on a TV show and are offered to open one of three doors. Behind one of the doors is a car, and behind the other two, there is nothing. You choose one of the doors, and the host opens one of the remaining two doors, revealing that there is no car behind it. You are then offered to change your decision (take the other door from the two remaining). The question is - does it make sense to do so?
And extra percentages do indeed exist, but I will omit the tirade about the variable from the movie's character (or its screenwriters):)
P.S. Sorry - I couldn't resist, but it really is one and the same.
__________________________________________
Если ты спориш с идиотом проверь не делает ли он то же самого
Пунктация и орфография авторские, критике не подлежат.
Мы не жалели времени и силы,
Земля дрожала под ногами тьмы,
И род людской, беспомощный и хилый,
Рабами стал закрывшейся тюрьмы.
P.S. I initially thought it was a moderator because the topic was in the Haven forum, but they are kind, so... )